Re: Lasers and ICBMs

2001-07-31 Thread Black Unicorn
> >Oops! "Accidentally" hit Tim May's house!" Probably not an accident.

Re: Lasers and ICBMs

2001-07-31 Thread Petro
At 11:39 PM -0700 7/26/01, Alan Olsen wrote: >On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote: >> > A lot of the calculations being sketched out here, of watts/cm^2, >> > dwell times, gold coatings, etc. are slightly off-base. We've known >> > for 20+ years that the

Re: Lasers and ICBMs

2001-07-27 Thread Alan Olsen
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote: > > > A lot of the calculations being sketched out here, of watts/cm^2, > > dwell times, gold coatings, etc. are slightly off-base. We've known > > for 20+ years that the kill method is to use a short pulse to "push"

Re: Lasers and ICBMs

2001-07-26 Thread Eugene Leitl
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote: > A lot of the calculations being sketched out here, of watts/cm^2, > dwell times, gold coatings, etc. are slightly off-base. We've known > for 20+ years that the kill method is to use a short pulse to "push" > (not from the photons' momentum) in the thin wall

Lasers and ICBMs

2001-07-26 Thread Tim May
Being older than most of you, I remember doing some of these calculations about burn times, laser intensities, etc. more than 20 years ago. (Although Reagan did not announce SDI until around 1983, the topic was widely discussed in the late '70s. "Scientific American" published articles by Prof