At 01:31 PM 4/7/02 +0800, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
>I'm sorry you've bought the terrorist line that it's all about US
>support for Israel.
RTFM. Or the Al-Quaeda declarations, at least.
> I know better.
So *you* claim. Chuckle.
>We could withdraw from the Middle
>East tomorrow, and all that
>>weasl>>"...You have so completely missed the point here that it's almost
comical. The fact that we provide aid and encouragement to the nazi-like
Israeli's is but a small part of our problem..."<<
Whats this 'we' whiteman? Do cypherpunks have a country? Is crypto-anarchy
providing aid to Is
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You've been listening to Shrub to much. What makes you think this is about
> > hating freedom? Might this not be about getting us to mind our own fucking
> > business???
>
> I really don't give a fig about the op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You've been listening to Shrub to much. What makes you think this is about
> hating freedom? Might this not be about getting us to mind our own fucking
> business???
I really don't give a fig about the opinions of the current resident of
the White House. I've been
> A warrior - whether guerrillero, risistant or regular - attacks his
> adversary directly and seeks to damage him, preferably enough to take
> him out of action.
Apparently you assume that males forced by economics or guns into
government-supplied uniform and/or operating machinery that delivers
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
> A terrorist attacks a target conveniently designated by him as SYMBOLIC
> of his chosen adversary; the target is preferably unsuspecting and
> undefended. The ultimate purpose is to frighten his adversary, or
> somebody with influence on that adver
It's very important to distinguish propaganda from fact. It is indeed
convenient to lable people you don't like "terrorist" - the Germans did
that with the French resistance - but fortunately there are generally
accepted definitions of that term against which propaganda labels can be
tested, if yo
At 02:59 PM 4/6/02 +0800, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
>Nonsense. If you can't see any difference between terrorists and
>risistants you are either wilfully ignorant or confused.
"Terrorist" is what the bigger side of an asymmetrical conflict
call the smaller side. Also "crazy", and other intended-
>>During World War II, entertainer Josephine Baker helped the French
Resistance by smuggling secret information written in invisible ink on her
sheet music.<<
She also had top secret chemical info hidden in banana's around her
waist,these had to be smoked to release the information.As for the sh
http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/apr/spies/index.html
[Ed: amusing that "sleeper agents" who infiltrated "occupied
territories" are
glorified by the winner of that conflict.. but when the US is the
occupier, the
resistance agents are "terrorists"..]
The Lad
10 matches
Mail list logo
