t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID...
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:51:10 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Gee whiz I'm scared. Look, since you're angling for some stats, come on
over
> to New
Actually, isn't that technically "Spanish harlem"?
Nope.
> Look for me: 6'1", 220 lbs and
> looking EXACTLY like someone would look after 7 years of GoJu
training...I'm
> the guy even the locals won't fuck with.
I know many of those locals, and 7 years of GoJu aint gonna do shit for a
1200f
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Gee whiz I'm scared. Look, since you're angling for some stats, come on over
> to New York. I'll meet you on the corner of 135th Street and St Nicholas
> Avenue (we call that neighborhood Harlem).
Actually, isn't that technically "Spanish harlem"?
> L
7 years of GoJu training...I'm
the guy even the locals won't fuck with.
-Tyler Durden
From: Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gubmint Tests Passport RFID...
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:20:54 -0400 (E
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whaddya know. Thompson said something that didn't make me want to beat
> him to death...
Too bad for you that I cannot say the same about what you write.
> > I have a different threat model.
>
> I've reached more or less the same conclusion. Or at
Whaddya know. Thompson said something that didn't make me want to beat him
to death...
I have a different threat model. I suggest that incompetence is _often_
deliberate and, at least to those who orchestrate such things, is designed
to leave or provide cracks in arbitrary systesm that will be
--- "Roy M. Silvernail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > And since one's passport essentially boils down to a chip, why not
> implant
> > it under the skin?
>
> You say that as though it hasn't been considered.
Good point. As many of us know, there
Quoting Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And since one's passport essentially boils down to a chip, why not implant
> it under the skin?
You say that as though it hasn't been considered.
> As for the encryption issue, can someone explain to me why it even matters?
It doesn't, actually. Ther
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,68451,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
And since one's passport essentially boils down to a chip, why not implant
it under the skin?
As for the encryption issue, can someone explain to me why it even matters?
It would seem to me that any "on-demand" access to o
