--
On 3 Aug 2001, at 7:35, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> You are wrong. I went and looked up the Caterpillar cite he gave.
> It is real.
I, and everyone else with half a brain, has long known that judges frequently say
"Hey, we are about to seize a truckload of your documents looking for deep
poc
At 12:20 AM -0700 8/3/01, Lucky Green wrote:
>Ray wrote:
>
>> [...] as one who
>> is not of the Priveleged Caste in terms of access to legal information,
>> (ie, willing to pay thousands of bucks to Westlaw or whoever each
>> year) I am grateful to him for passing it on.
>
>There are Cypherpunk
Paul E. Robichaux wrote:
> ...the fact remains that some
> contributors to this list produce
> more valuable material than others.
> Uni, Tim, Peter Trei, JYA, Sandy,
> and a number of other old-school
> c'punks have been making this list
> worth reading since 1993 or so...
Thanks. It's a real
An Metet chastised Uni thus:
>Your complaints about "free research" suggest that you have the sense
>that you are more valuable than or superior to other contributors.
Some animals really *are* more equal than others. Whether Uni has this sense
or not[1], the fact remains that some contributors
ECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gotti, evidence, case law, remailer practices, civil cases,
> civilit
>
>
> Black Unicorn, esquire, wrote:
> > (Lesson for other posters- to get legal research for free out of
> > Uni, just insult him a lot)...
> >
> > ...Seriously interes
Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are Cypherpunks without a Westlaw or LEXIS login? The mind boggles...
Ones outside the USA who aren't (or rather shouldn't be) subject to
American law?
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
only two things are infinite, the univers
Black Unicorn wrote:
>> Your complaints about "free research" suggest that you have the sense
>> that you are more valuable than or superior to other contributors.
>
>I think that's quite a reach on your part if you are pointing it out
>generally.
I don't think so. Other people don't think so.
Ray wrote:
> [...] as one who
> is not of the Priveleged Caste in terms of access to legal information,
> (ie, willing to pay thousands of bucks to Westlaw or whoever each
> year) I am grateful to him for passing it on.
There are Cypherpunks without a Westlaw or LEXIS login? The mind boggles.
Black Unicorn, esquire, wrote:
> (Lesson for other posters- to get legal research for free out of
> Uni, just insult him a lot)...
>
> ...Seriously interested researchers will spend time at the library,
> look up statutes and learn to Shepardize. I happened to be at the
> law library for an unrel
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, An Metet wrote:
>Your complaints about "free research" suggest that you have the sense
>that you are more valuable than or superior to other contributors.
He is not "superior" in any substantial way; however, his expertise
in law, combined with a willingness to actually disc
There was some discussion a while back (check the archives since I
probably sent a URL) about how 'the law' was being buried in copyrighted
archives that were unavailable to the 'common man'...
Just another example of how fucked up the courts and law in general in
this country is.
On Thu, 2 Aug
11 matches
Mail list logo
