-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- - Original Message -
From: Mister Heex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 4:20 PM
Subject: CDR: Got towed away (Was: Got carried away...)
> Jan Dobrucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fantasized:
>
Jan Dobrucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fantasized:
+So someone can steel the pgp keys of the driver, but what if
+ the key was, say a tatoe on his hand and would be visible only when
+ the drivers was thinking of say... green fried tomatoes.
Ah but will you be implementing Repossession Escrow,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Do you want to use crypto or biometrics?
I was thinking of mixing the two.
Jan Dobrucki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 2.6.3ia
Charset: cp850
Comment: information is ammunition
iQEVAwUBPNSMIw/jCFZJN2XlAQH6Hwf/QKNuJkrVn66thzNj3KC/MwoFFQWRIk1d
bue
Steve Furlong wrote:
>US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
>wire loops or bars and are locked with ordinary (if rather heavy-duty)
>padlocks.
Speaking of securing military vehicles... I understand that most US fighter
jets are not equipped with self-starters. T
> Optimizzin Al-gorithym[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> At 09:02 AM 4/30/02 -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
> >Ken Brown wrote:
> >
> >> ... An even
> >> if cars were "like little tanks" why not open them with ordinary
> >> physical keys, like real tanks?
> >
> >US tanks don't have built-in locks as
At 09:02 AM 4/30/02 -0400, Steve Furlong wrote:
>Ken Brown wrote:
>
>> ... An even
>> if cars were "like little tanks" why not open them with ordinary
>> physical keys, like real tanks?
>
>US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
>wire loops or bars and are locked w
Ken Brown wrote:
> ... An even
> if cars were "like little tanks" why not open them with ordinary
> physical keys, like real tanks?
US tanks don't have built-in locks as in private autos. They have heavy
wire loops or bars and are locked with ordinary (if rather heavy-duty)
padlocks.
--
Steve
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Neil Johnson wrote:
>
> I made a sign for a friend who had recently purchased a Vette.
> It said "please ignore, this car is just a AMC Pacer with a REALLY GOOD paint
> job".
>
You gotta be old enough to remember the pacer for that to make sense tho
:-) I hope it was bi
I think I'll stick to my bicycle.
Why would anyone would want to waste their money on a car like that? Or
even trust their body to it? I suppose insurance companies might have
an interest in limiting use of a car to people who were paid-up. An even
if cars were "like little tanks" why not open t
On Monday 29 April 2002 06:10 am, Graham Lally wrote:
>
> Path of least resistance - *access* to the car is generally not the
> problem. Instead weaker attacks such as breaking the glass, or forcing the
> door work much better. Once inside, a different mechanism again would be
> somebody just stea
Jan Dobrucki wrote:
> I do have an idea thou. I'm thinking how to implement PGP into car
> locks. And so far I got this: The driver has his PGP, and the door
> has it's own.
Path of least resistance - *access* to the car is generally not the problem.
Instead weaker attacks such as breaking the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quoting Jan Dobrucki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I do have an idea thou. I'm thinking how to implement PGP into car
> locks. And so far I got this: The driver has his PGP, and the door
> has it's own. The door has only one reciepient, the driver. And when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Greetings.
I got carried away a bit. Sorry. I'm on this list from around 1998
and I never had so much trash in my mail before. There is far too
many ads, and what more, 5-6 viruses each day. So I blew my head off
bout the USA.
I'm a student of law, no
13 matches
Mail list logo
