In , on 07/24/00
at 03:07 PM, Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>We should honor his request and, as a side effect, get rid of all of the
>unclued
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> types of "suscrivers."
>Good riddance.
I agree 110%. I do not pull toad.com for my openpgp.net node but still get the t
"Patrick Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim Choate wrote:
> > As of today the current toad.com member list is below.
>
> I can't believe that 1) the who command is enabled on toad, and 2) that you'd
> post all these addresses to the list. Talk about a massive invasion of privacy.
First,
At 03:29 AM 7/20/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
>
>Check out the standard features of Majordomo. The command "who
>cypherpunks" has been used since the inception of the list(s).
>
But most (all?) other nodes have shut off this 'feature'
Hi,
I've sent a couple of emails to the toad.com operators and have received
nothing back. I see this is indicating a distinct lack of interest on
their part.
As of today the current toad.com member list is below. It looks like
we could drop it completely if cyberpass and algebra would drop.
N
