On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:55:01PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> Bell's case is not an acceptable example for a variety of reasons.
Wow. Jim Choate agrees with me, or I agree with him, or something like that.
-Declan
Tim May wrote:
>At 2:37 AM +0200 7/11/01, Anonymous wrote:
>>Tim May wrote:
>>> I will say that there is no country out there that seems to be
>>> beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement, pace the points we discuss
>>> so often about drug warriors, freezing of accounts, extradition,
>>> etc.
At 2:37 AM +0200 7/11/01, Anonymous wrote:
>Tim May wrote:
>> I will say that there is no country out there that seems to be
>> beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement, pace the points we discuss
>> so often about drug warriors, freezing of accounts, extradition,
>> etc. Even Yugoslavia has
How about Costa Rica? I met some people from there
who said the government there was very cool, no problems.
OTOH, anyplace you go that you're a foreigner, you always
stand out. But Costa Rica has always attracted me, both
politically and geographically, because the upland weather
is qui
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:50:46PM -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> descendants. Basically, you're allowed to piss them off a
> little, and they still need some kind of excuse to arrest
> you. But once you've pissed them off, any excuse will do,
> even (as Bell's case teaches us) the legal exe
At 06:33 PM 7/10/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>These little Carribean potentates are far, far, far worse than what we
>face in the U.S.
The sad truth is that if you're a gun owner and like to have variety in
what you collect, no "western democracy" is going to be a better fit than
the U.S. Even so
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>Seems to me the only answer is to keep moving, don't settle in any one
>country (or store your possessions in any one jurisdiction) for a lengthy
>stay. A couple of years max.
Um, no. A couple of years would have been fine a decade ago, but
these days
At 7:59 PM -0400 7/10/01, Adam Back wrote:
>I was thinking online obscurity (nyms, pseudonymous web pages etc) coupled
>with a low tax jurisdiction like Anguilla wouldn't be one interesting
>combination.
>
>But there are plenty of disadvantages too -- limited amenities - shops,
>computer parts, th
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Adam Back wrote:
> I was thinking online obscurity (nyms, pseudonymous web pages etc) coupled
> with a low tax jurisdiction like Anguilla wouldn't be one interesting
> combination.
>
> But there are plenty of disadvantages too -- limited amenities - shops,
> computer parts,
Tim May wrote:
> I will say that there is no country out there that seems to be
> beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement, pace the points we discuss
> so often about drug warriors, freezing of accounts, extradition,
> etc. Even Yugoslavia has just bowed to U.S. financing pressures
> (sending Mi
I was thinking online obscurity (nyms, pseudonymous web pages etc) coupled
with a low tax jurisdiction like Anguilla wouldn't be one interesting
combination.
But there are plenty of disadvantages too -- limited amenities - shops,
computer parts, the advantages being within reasonable travelling d
At 7:19 PM +0100 7/6/01, Ken Brown wrote:
>"A. Melon" wrote:
...
>> 'political crimes', it seems the best options are to simply leave the
>> country altogether or forget about the personal freedoms granted by the
>> constitution.
>
>> So my question is: where to go?
>
>> How does one
>> 'dr
Belize? Unless you're looking for somewhere that doesn't have extradition
laws with the US? Sri Lanka, Arthur C. Clarke is there... Not sure if they
extradite.. Of course they have terrorists.
ming
[This is a sig file]
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Ken Brown wrote:
> "A. Melon" wrote:
> >
> > Well, th
13 matches
Mail list logo
