On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Black Unicorn wrote:
> Prosecutor: You retained copies of this document?
> Witness: No.
> Prosecutor: You have none of these documents in your possession or control?
> Witness: No.
> Prosecutor: Are you aware of any other copies of this document?
> Witness: Yes.
> Prosecu
--
On 31 Jul 2001, at 12:22, Black Unicorn wrote:
> Not being intimately familiar with the spec of freenet I can't
> really comment on that aspect or what a court will consider
> "impossible." What will not amuse a court is the appearance of
> an ex ante concealment or disclosure in anticipat
J jails
> reporter, Ashcroft allows more journalist subpoenas
>
>
> Unicorn wrote:
>
> > Not being intimately familiar with the spec of freenet I can't
> > really comment
> > on that aspect or what a court will consider "impossible."
> What will
--
Dark Unicorn:
> > Not a particularly useful answer and not necessarily justifiable on the
> > part of the court. I think eventually a better answer would have to be
> > produced, one that justified the censorship. We're back to what
> > originally struck me as odd, and wrong, about this ite
> There are legitimate purposes for escrowing it on the Isle of Man
> over and above keeping it out of a court's hands. The key is to
> have _some_ leg to stand on when asked "if not trying to thwart the
> authority of this court, why did you do that." Good answers might
> sound like: "I wanted
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: DOJ jails reporter, Ashcroft allows more journalist subpoenas
> On 30 Jul 2001, at 14:38, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> > Prosecutor: You retained
- Original Message -
From: "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"'Black Unicorn'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: DOJ jails
Black Unicorn wrote:
> > Looks like a reporter ( or anyone else for that matter ) should keep
> > well hidden backups of their notes and work so that they can comply with
> > Napolean complexes, fishing expeditions and spin control operations and
> > not lose their life's work.
>
> No. Well hi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Black Unicorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: DOJ jails reporter, Ashcroft allows more journalist subpoenas
> Black
> --
> From: Black Unicorn[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Declan,
> > The larger problem notwithstanding there's at least one little bit of
> > language in this piece that is odd :
> >
> > "He said the government is
> >seeking all of Legg
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: DOJ jails reporter, Ashcroft allows more journalist subpoenas
> Declan,
>
> The larger problem notwithstanding there&#
Declan,
The larger problem notwithstanding there's at least one little bit of
language in this piece that is odd :
"He said the government is
seeking all of Leggett's
material, including all
originals and copies."
Even if we make the extreme assumption that there is some pressing
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FC: DOJ jails reporter, Ashcroft allows more journalist subpoenas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 22:06:07 -0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eu
13 matches
Mail list logo
