Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-24 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: David J. Brunell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The key concepts are force and fraud. Neither should be initiated from one > human entity to another. By "human entity" I mean person, corporation, or > government. Why are force and fraud wrong? Because it is against man's > na

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in

2000-04-12 Thread Petro
>Tom Vogt wrote: >> >> but all this is hypothetical, since I'm not talking about industrial >> power of 1900 or 1940, but of corporate power in 2000, and especially of >> the years yet to come. > >Ok, so give us some documentation. How many people did Bill Gates & Co kill >and what are the details

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors

2000-04-12 Thread Matt Elliott
>If Microsoft really wanted to screw Apple, they'd simply discontinue >Word/Office/etc. for MacOS. They did do this. Apple had to beat them over the head with the QuickTime source code theft to get them to continue making the software. In exchange Apple agreed to let them have the source code t

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-07 Thread David Honig
At 04:47 PM 4/6/00 +0200, Tom Vogt wrote: >David Honig wrote: >> > protection of patent monopolies, >> >> Individual inventors get patents, what extra rights do >> corps get? > >patent portfolios. a long time ago, in a country not very far away (i.e. >the US of A) patents were rare and only grant

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-06 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Economics doesn't recognise rights, that's politics. Don't confuse the > two. Just like Tom Vogt believes that being a Nazi prevents one from being a socialist, you fail to understand that politics is a subset of economics, the one where

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-06 Thread Tom Vogt
David Honig wrote: > > protection of patent monopolies, > > Individual inventors get patents, what extra rights do > corps get? patent portfolios. a long time ago, in a country not very far away (i.e. the US of A) patents were rare and only granted after extensive examination for really worthy i

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-05 Thread Tom Vogt
David Honig wrote: > >Microsoft broke every one of these. They have gone out of their way to > >reduce the ability of competition to come to market. > > Do you think you have to buy your competition a billboard > for 'equal access'? Must your salespeople > refer customers to competitors if they

Re: Crypto-Anarchy/Anarcho-Capitalist Errors in Understanding

2000-04-05 Thread David Honig
At 08:01 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Jim Choate wrote: >Microsoft broke every one of these. They have gone out of their way to >reduce the ability of competition to come to market. Do you think you have to buy your competition a billboard for 'equal access'? Must your salespeople refer customers to compet