<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
#I'm sure the locals aren't looking forward to pissing off one
#of their potential "agents of funding" on something as
#inconsequential as a simple bimbo killing...
Yes, that's a factoid not to be dismissed.
Today on the news it was clearly stated that
At 9:12 PM -0500 7/9/01, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
>> > Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special
>> > objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet?
>>
>> Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on
At 10:04 PM -0400 7/9/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special
>> objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet?
>
>Right. It was former AG Thornburgh
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:37:02PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> It depends on the specific phrasings used. And whether he was under
> oath (for a "perjury" charge). If the FBI was present, a so-called
> "1001" violation could have occurred, though it is difficult to prove
> such lies.
Then again, t
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Dynamite Bob wrote:
> Its illegal to lie to cops (though not to be mute to them).
>
> Will Condit get busted for lying about bonking
> his intern or are congresscritters special objects?
Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special
objects". I
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> > Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special
> > objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet?
>
> Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on a talk show yesterday
> that the cops still hadn't searched
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special
> objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet?
Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on a talk show yesterday
that the cops still h
At 4:22 PM -0700 7/9/01, Dynamite Bob wrote:
>Its illegal to lie to cops (though not to be mute to them).
>
It depends on the specific phrasings used. And whether he was under
oath (for a "perjury" charge). If the FBI was present, a so-called
"1001" violation could have occurred, though it is d
Its illegal to lie to cops (though not to be mute to them).
Will Condit get busted for lying about bonking
his intern or are congresscritters special objects?
