Re: CDR: Re: list spam, game theory, etal.

2002-02-08 Thread measl
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You are not sufficiently suspicious and cynical. > > Observe that the three people who are spamming and trolling > this list have similar political views, views whose > implementation requires a large and powerful state. You need to realie that I a

Re: CDR: RE: list spam, game theory,etal.

2002-02-07 Thread proffr11
>>Until mattd made his actual purposes known (i.e., that this > is seen by him as a free archive service), << Interesting who's objecting,the fools,liars and knaves are coming out of the rotten woodwork. >>I had > [personally] lumped him in with Jei - vocal, but useless. You are not suffici

Re: CDR: Re: list spam, game theory, etal.

2002-02-07 Thread jamesd
-- On 7 Feb 2002, at 1:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jim, I believe Peter's point, and mine as well, is that > posters such as Jei and mattd differ by their intent. Jei > is obviously a participant, and an active one. Whether or > not anyone cares to listen, he's "legit" in that he is > act

Re: CDR: Re: list spam, game theory, etal.

2002-02-06 Thread measl
Jim, I believe Peter's point, and mine as well, is that posters such as Jei and mattd differ by their intent. Jei is obviously a participant, and an active one. Whether or not anyone cares to listen, he's "legit" in that he is actively engaging those who care to receive him. For those who do n