Jim Choate wrote:
> And just exactly what algorithm is that you're using to determine
> crypt-v-plaintext?
that's a problem. if no such algorithm exists, I suggest that - for this
specific purpose - a few heuristics would do. suggestion (version 0.1):
- dictionary of 100 most common words from e
Steve Furlong wrote:
> Why not just read the first 20 bytes of the body? If 90% or more aren't
> printable ASCII assume the message is encrypted.
Or compressed, or a bitmap, or executable code, or coming from an EBCDIC
machine, or using a weird variant of Unicode that you weren't previously
aw
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Ryan McBride wrote:
> Mixmaster can be installed in the low-maintenance
> `middleman' mode. In that mode, it will send mail to
> other remailers only, to avoid complaints about
> anonymous messages.
>
> Obviously
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, dmolnar wrote:
> > but why would there be a continuing expense in this area?
>
> People will use your remailer to send spam and death threats.
> The recipients will contact you and your ISP. Repeatedly.
One of the ways to mitigate this risk is to set up your remailer in
mid
