--
On 27 Aug 2001, at 23:22, Aimee Farr wrote:
> Considering the incredibly bad timing of this discussion in
> light of world events, I don't see how you could call ME a
> provocateur. My jibe was good-natured. You keep posting the
> equivalent of classified ads. I know who wants this shit
> You complained a few weeks ago about the timing of the "help me make
> bombz" posts...as if we have any choice about when AOL-accounted narcs
> post such requests.
I don't think I complained about their timing, I think I complained about
their very existence.
> And now, bizarrely, you think th
> Not so bright, though. And you've outed yourself by not-so-subtle hints
> about the SS "prime rib."
When I said "prime rib," I meant PRIME RIB. Our little hamburger joint has
taken on greater culinary responsibility.
~Aimee
On Monday, August 27, 2001, at 07:53 PM, Aimee Farr wrote:
> The EEA wasn't passed until 96. I failed to mention Title 18 United
> States
> Code, Section(s) 794(c).
>
> "Agents kick crypto ass."
> http://www.fas.org/irp/ops/ci/regan_complaint.html'
> That wouldn't be what has your little m
On Monday, August 27, 2001, at 09:22 PM, Aimee Farr wrote:
>> Your role as an agent provocateur here is noted.
>
> Your role as a son-uv-a-bitch to me is noted.
>
> Trying to keep people out of trouble is a "provocateur?" Gee, sorry to
> dampen your conspiracy.
>
> I posted Regan because it was d
> Your role as an agent provocateur here is noted.
Your role as a son-uv-a-bitch to me is noted.
Trying to keep people out of trouble is a "provocateur?" Gee, sorry to
dampen your conspiracy.
I posted Regan because it was directly relevant to this discussion, and it
makes a couple of points --
> Despite frequently urging newcomers to "read the archives--or at least
> use some search engines!," nitwits like Aimee are only just now figuring
> out what was crystal clear in 1992-3.
The EEA wasn't passed until 96. I failed to mention Title 18 United States
Code, Section(s) 794(c).
"Agents
