X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "petro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> In any case, I never suggested that MenWithGuns should force AOL to
> >> modify its hate speech policy.
> >
> >It could have been easily interpreted as such (and it has been).
>
> Anyone who has been reading Mr. May's missives for any l
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "T. Bankson Roach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now do you think we need it to be an absolute right
> to express whatever rotten, nasty, clean, or loving thought we might
> have made part of a new Constitution in case the idiots can't see this
> is a already a right, or should
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In any case, I never suggested that MenWithGuns should force AOL to
> modify its hate speech policy.
It could have been easily interpreted as such (and it has been).
Now, couldn't you have posted this message in the first place? Apparent
At 1:22 PM -0400 8/11/00, David Honig wrote:
>At 12:56 PM 8/11/00 -0400, Jim Burnes wrote:
>>
>>While I agree with Tom that AOL sucks rocks etc etc, you paper analogy
>>isn't quite correct -- or at least its incomplete. If I sell you paper
>>and find out your printing racist drivel with it, it's
At 12:56 PM 8/11/00 -0400, Jim Burnes wrote:
>
>While I agree with Tom that AOL sucks rocks etc etc, you paper analogy
>isn't quite correct -- or at least its incomplete. If I sell you paper
>and find out your printing racist drivel with it, it's perfectly
>within my rights to stop selling you p
