--
On 7 Nov 2001, at 17:21, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>
> > You're still incredibly deluded. Even Hayek (bad as he is) would have
> > supported someone's decision NOT to sell to someone else, your rethoric
> > notwithstanding. BTW, do you have anything el
Reese wrote:
> At 04:42 PM 11/7/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> >Jim, you pompous ass,
>
> Why not just call him a dumb cunt?
Reese might have a point here. When Reese uses a derogatory term for women,
he demeans all women. By calling Jimbo a pompous ass, I am demeaning all
donkeys.
S a n
Butthead,
You wrote:
> It's interesting that in lambasting me for
> 'knowing what Hayek would say' is EXACTLY
> what you're doing. At least I back my
> hubris with quotes from Hayeks works.
Watch your attribution bonehead. I've not participated in the Hayek
discussion at all except to point ou
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> Jim, you pompous ass,
There's the pot calling the kettle black...
> Of course I've read the books and of course I know he was against centrally
> planned economies. So what?
He was against more than 'planned economies'. Apparently you didn't read
Jim, you pompous ass,
You wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
> > Let me get this right. Jimbo is
> > CHANNELING Hayek? Yeah, right.
>
> Not at all,
>
> http://www.mises.org/hayekbio.asp
>
> you should read the books instead of just
> trusting other peoples interpretation...
>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> Let me get this right. Jimbo is CHANNELING Hayek? Yeah, right.
Not at all,
http://www.mises.org/hayekbio.asp
you should read the books instead of just trusting other peoples
interpretation...he was decidedly against central or control economices
(
On Tue, Nov 06, at 05:42PM, Marcel Popescu wrote:
| And in this, he gave way to David Friedman and the like. Hayek is the least
| Austrian of the Austrians. Look to Mises - or better yet, to Rothbard - to
| find a much better Austrian.
By and by, "better" is a relative term...
|
On Tue, Nov 06, at 09:19AM, Tim May wrote:
| Bluntly, when Choate makes strange claims about math, history, physics,
| and economics, it's never worth the time to try to correct his many
| wrong-headed (in our reality) ideas and definitions.
Thank you for helping me see the ligh
On Mon, Nov 05, at 07:44PM, Jim Choate wrote:
| What does it take to create a 'free market'? Hayeks says 'perfect
| competition'.
Here you go using a Good Name(tm) in vain...again.
| What is 'perfect competition'?
"Perfect Competition" is not an Austrian idea,
in fact, it is an
Tim (and other C-A-C-L proponents) have opined that a 'business' has the
'right' to refuse service to anyone for any reason. This is clearly
contrary to both the concept of 'rights' and 'free market' (and is
diametricaly opposed to what C-A-C-L proponents claim(!) to want).
Things don't have rig
10 matches
Mail list logo