At 07:23 AM 9/17/2001 +, Ryan Lackey wrote:
>The only viable long-term solution I see for most of these things is
>charging per-transaction for messages. Remailers are exactly the kind of
>application where "postage" could first be applied. The problems seem
>twofold:
>
>1) Remailer operato
--
On 17 Sep 2001, at 10:30, Ryan Lackey wrote:
> I'm not sure if I buy that remailers are even going to have
> serious problems in the future. I see two approaches:
>
> 1) The aforementioned ecash-based system. We don't have a
> problem getting people to smuggle drugs, because people in
> t
--
On 17 Sep 2001, at 7:54, Dr. Evil wrote:
> Yes, there are no "sustainable" non-tracable remote payment
> systems in existence, and it's almost impossible for such a
> system to exist. Why? There are many reasons. One of the
> most obvious ones is that it would be so disruptive to the
> ac
I'm not sure if I buy that remailers are even going to have serious
problems in the future. I see two approaches:
1) The aforementioned ecash-based system. We don't have a problem
getting people to smuggle drugs, because people in the drug game get
lots of money, women, cars, etc. I wonder how
