I got the invite as well. It LOOKS like they might be adding a little of
the OLD Freedom back in. Anyone know if it's more than one proxy server,
and if ZKS is going to control it/them?
I haven't uninstalled freedom 3.0, but I haven't used Freedom at all since
they pulled the tunneling.
At 12:27 PM 9/12/2001 -0400, Sundar wrote:
>...
>Fucking troll! If anything, you have a lot more in common with those
>responsible for this atrocy than you do with any freedom loving citizen of
>the USA. Or for that matter any cypherpunk.
>
>This was an attack against our liberty. Against our f
dishonest to be considered, or too ignorant to be
>qualified. You aren't going to get what you by
>electing a politician won't even tell the truth
>about the current state of government or his
>intentions for the Presidency.
...
At this point, based on the above math, I stopped reading.
Good luck,
Sean Roach
At 10:31 AM 10/11/2000, Ray Dillinger wrote:
...
>Also, it looks like the sort of thing that could be designed around.
>If someone were building a "secure laptop" they could make a video
>system and drivers that wrote the bits in a different, randomized
>order each time, and which only wrote the c
At 10:55 AM 10/5/2000, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>There's no person called "market", therefore it has no "interest". It's a
>decision of the current resource owners - and when demand increases (as in
>the case of a major disaster), they *have to* increase their prices until
>the supply is equal to th
At 12:30 AM 10/5/2000, Tim May wrote:
> That you would say "beautiful sentiment" to the overall article you
quoted is...scary.
Perhaps I misspoke. What I meant to get across was that the article was
compelling, but I didn't believe it was practicle.
26 megabytes is a bit much, I should have
message using modern techniques have a near flat distribution of all
characters used?
Good luck,
Sean Roach
Okay, before I start, I better state outright that I haven't read the whole
thread.
A recipe for reducing spam.
Ask Gilmore to put a vacation program on his cypherpunks address. At the
same time, invite all current subscribers to resubscribe to one of the
remaining members of the list.
Ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 08:10 PM 7/3/00 -0400, William Rowden wrote:
>
>
...
>In the absence of a nym to which I can respond, here is my initial
>public response (a question and an observation):
>
> 1. Should standards for reporting on the remailer network be part
> of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point, I wrote:
...
>Of course, you could just keep all information on the disk
>encrypted, which will be the next probable comment, considering the
>pattern of this list.
At 10:08 PM 7/4/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote:
...
>Just write o
a battleship? No.
Just keep the boarders from walking away under thier own power. It
looks like you pretty much need someone on the inside to get in
conveniently, and anything that those weapons couldn't threaten could
probably take out the whole platform from 12 miles off anyway.
Hen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 09:27 PM 6/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>Lucky:
>>
>> >I agree with Peter in that Sealand may wish to consider adding a
>> nuke to
>> >their budget of small arms. Nuclear powers are the only
>> sovereigns that
>> >command any kind of respect from
12 matches
Mail list logo
