).
The ephemeral keys cannot (or should not) be retrive(able)d.
(below!) Or perhaps the question you were asking was "if finding DL's mod
_this prime_ becomes possible, will I lose forward security?", in which case
the answer is "yer fukked" - as are we all - if one
stop some elementary mistakes.
[1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/sfs3.pdf
[2] www.cs.rice.edu/Conferences/IPTPS02/107.pdf
--
Peter Fairbrother
uot;There is a real difference when a
> prosecutor knows 23 citizens are there observing what's going on," he
> said
>
> ...
>
> The administration proposal was introduced in the House last week by
> Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.).
>
> Hmm, other Rep.tiles
would agree with that legislation. IMO, email should be similar.
But it don't solve the spam problem :-(
--
Peter Fairbrother
*They do censor UK email, but they do it in the US. The relevant legal
phrase is "public telecommunications service provider", not "common
carrier". I
se OE...
Perhaps @lne.com and @minder.net could do this? Or, if people prefer,
@einstein.ssz.com could stop setting the Reply-To: header?
Or would having all the nodes do it the same way be too conventional for
cypherpunks...
--
Peter Fairbrother
ance is much higher. But most modern monitors will emit much
less than that. I hope! >
[**]< I replaced the black in Marcus's anti-em-tempest fonts with
180:210:210, and varied the other colours in proportion. >
--
Peter Fairbrother
Peter Fairbrother (me) wrote (in a different thread):
> BTW, m-o-o-t uses a randomised virtual keyboard with (both EM and optical)
> TEMPEST resistant fonts. It's okay for inputting keys, but it's a hassle
> for inputting text.
>
> Which means that your keys might be s
NOT do this with crappy Apple keyboards! They are membrane-based and
will be destroyed. They are also hard to open for repair, and when I asked
an Apple chap about them he said "You should never drink near a keyboard".
What crap!
I give no guarantee that it won't destroy your keyboard
ly not me, i haven't the time just now) can probably apply
wavelet theory and get all this from steady-state theory, and tie it up in a
nice package.
--
Peter Fairbrother
soidal waveform.
And that's why good analogue is better then good digital.
Doug Self etc. did some work on ultra-fast analogue systems in the mid 90's,
and designed some amps that were and are regarded as pretty good - but afaik
he didn't get the theory right.
YHHH!--
Peter Fairbrother
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/11/sprj.irq.fries/index.html
>
> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The cafeteria menus in the three House office buildings
> changed the name of "french fries" to "freedom fries," in a culinary rebuke
> of France stemming from anger over the cou
ou wonder what they're on. Prisoner's Dilemma steroids, I
suppose.
--
Peter Fairbrother
ps would it include using a GSM mobile in a bank robbery?
Parliament,
but it's two-and-a-bit years old and still isn't in force. No signs of that
happening either, except a few platitudes about "later".
b) Plod would have to prove you have the key, and refused to give it, before
you got convicted. Kinda hard to do.
c) you already know this!!!
--
Peter Fairbrother
th) of line needed
is _much_ (order of mag+) less than a space elevator. And you don't need a
hypersonic 'plane.
You can also fling things away from the tether when they're going away from
the Earth. Can get any (reasonable) speed you like.
--
Peter Fairbrother
me again.
Space transport:
I like the two-stage-to-orbit solution for humans, with the booster stage
piloted. The maths works well. I don't know about scramjets etc for the
booster, but a few rockets would do, with an aero fuselage to take off and
land. Using current airline technology mostly. Saf
quid fuel... Removes
CO2 too.
Not a new idea.
--
Peter Fairbrother
blic domain has been impoverished by this, in the sense that
newer works have not fallen into it.
--
Peter Fairbrother
*who agreed not to charge me - must be on happy pills!
hinations surrounding it,
and the out-of-court not-really-a-settlement, is another interesting, but
overlong, story - and perhaps "Wind in the Willows", but I don't know
offhand who owns that one - might be the Bodleian).
At least that was the position a couple of years ago, but anything may have
happened since then, and plenty is about to happen.
--
Peter Fairbrother
uality verified email addresses to sell them to spam business.
Would the spam business _want_ email addresses from people who download
ripped games/ movies?
Or would eg RIAA be more motivated?
--
Peter Fairbrother
I just got this spam, and I was wondering if it was a honey-pot. Anyone? The
site exists, and advertises games and movies for download.
--
Peter Fairbrother
>
> Frank
>
> You've gotta see this website: http://209.132.227.38/lotr/index.htm
>
> I just downloaded Lor
d burn a DVD from such an image, so direct copying is
probably easy enough. Maybe I'm wrong, I haven't tried it, but the pirates
don't seem to have any technical trouble.
The regionalisation issue was another monopoly grab. The DVD format is as
much a monopoly as Microsoft or Intel (probably more...)
--
Peter Fairbrother
d (and very illegal!) to
forge. Also the dollar bill is still spendable, so the only cost of your
accesses are the "pull"s.
Depends on your threat model, of course.
--
Peter Fairbrother
f you don't choose to use these methods, the consequences are up to you.
But secure comms alone will only provide you with useful information, by
themselves they aren't enough; you need to vote. Lots of you.
Nothing else really matters. To "them", and you.
--
Peter Fairbrother
ow the threats you
are facing with GAK and the like. If you think a resume should be
required...
--
Peter Fairbrother
i sing of Olaf glad and big
whose warmest heart recoiled at war:
a conscientious object-or
his wellbelovid colonel (trig
westpointer most succinctly bred)
to
ut why can't it be a
distributed issuer without central control (or even distributed control?)?
Can't the protocol deal with the problem of issue?
(We'd have to write a damn good one, of course)
--
Peter Fairbrother
bear wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Peter Fairbrother wr
lude an accounting of all the "money" issued. And not
be reliant on one computer to keep the records.
Or the propounders wanting to: make a profit/control the bank?
--
Peter Fairbrother
(who's drunk now, but will be sober tomorrow, and may regret posting this
then...)
That it is unknowable.
No he didn't. He proved Mathematics is incomplete, ie that there are
universally valid but unprovable statements within it.
He proved that any system that contains Peano arithmetic (roughly, a concept
of the natural numbers) is incomplete. Mathematics certainly contains
uted meanings of "complete" are
identical/the differences are irrelevant; - and that his definition (above)
is sufficient, eg (but not ie) that proof of negation is not required.
--
Peter Fairbrother
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
>> What I don't understand is how a node knows the location of a person
>> who moves about in the first place.
>
> The node spans a cell. Similiar to your cellular phone, you can link an ID
> to
n. It is a
> good idea to use a few GPS anchor nodes, so that all domains are
> consistent.
What I don't understand is how a node knows the location of a person who
moves about in the first place.
Also, I don't like the idea that my location is known by the location of my
equipment.
ssued? as ISBN 0-674-32449-8 at around $25,
but I haven't seen the new version) which should also give you the history
of the term.
--
Peter Fairbrother
* The one mentioned is available at
http://www.ddc.net/ygg/etext/godel/godel3.htm
if anyone wants to have a look. It's commonly called
x27;s from the Greek para- "beyond"; but I've never
heard the "paradox" story before.
I hope this at least interested some, and was not just troll-food.
--
Peter Fairbrother
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
>> Completeness has nothing to do with whether statements can or cannot be
>> expressed within a system.
>>
>> A system is complete if every sentence that is valid within the system ca
more accurate than musket balls. Rifles take more training to use as
well.
But I think the main reason that rifles didn't play a bigger part, apart
from the usual military inertia (google Ferguson rifle for a British example
of this), was the simple lack of rifles, and their cost. Many men
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
>> Jim Choate wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What I'd like to know is does Godel's apply to all forms of
>>> para-consistent logic as well
>
>> However you can
ng. I think Ben
(Laurie) was interested in doing something along these lines.
-- Peter Fairbrother
though, but ordering in those fields where it
doesn't apply is usually* impossible, so you can't even define a "last"
prime there.
Of course we can't even prove "cogito ergo sum", but I don't think that was
your point.
-- Peter Fairbrother
Non-mathematici
ve is to give citizens the feeling that something is being done,
it's just more political bullshit, but with unfortunate consequences. I
can't think of any other possible motives.
-- Peter Fairbrother
that could limit the damage spam
could do, and be a better way to do it than involving stopping real (false
positive) emails.
A slightly drunk (you don't see me here very drunk that often, lucky
someone ,
-- Peter Fairbrother
usually, on Windows boxen) now install similar
software keyloggers remotely, without needing to break in.
-- Peter Fairbrother
e general will plan his defences according to his opponent's
capabilities, not according to his opponent's avowed intentions.
However, in this case the intention to attack with all available weapons has
not been well hidden. There may be some dupes who honestly profess that no
attack is planned, and some naif's who cannot or will not see the wood, but
they will reap the whirlwind.
My humble opinion,
-- Peter Fairbrother
> Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> At 03:27 PM 7/15/02 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>>> Optimizzin Al-gorithym wrote:
>>
>>> And while QM can't help you with a particular atom, it also doesn't
> say
>>> that its impossible that knowledge
rnal states of the atom
> wouldn't help you predict its fragmentation.
Yes it does.
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Ring a Bell?
-- Peter Fairbrother
43 matches
Mail list logo
