Re: The Privacy/Untraceability Sweet Spot

2001-08-31 Thread Paul Pomes
At 09:12 PM 8/30/01 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But >> even given the tattered First Amendment, there is still a difference >> between speech and action. > >Complete and utter bullshit. And complete and utter loss of reputation capital on your part. It disagrees 100% with my interactions

Re: Stealth Computing Abuses TCP Checksums

2001-08-30 Thread Paul Pomes
At 07:00 AM 8/30/01 -0500, "Dean, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Don't fall for this. After registering at www.nature.com (supplying >personal details), you find you'll have to pay to see the article. What a surprise that the leading science journal in the world charges for the latest cont

Re: Stealth Computing Abuses TCP Checksums

2001-08-30 Thread Paul Pomes
ect from CNN :-) >But it does say that the paper will be published in "Nature" this week. And the message in my mailbox immediately after the above was Nature's ToC including: Parasitic computing A-L BARABASI, V W FREEH, H JEONG & J B BROCKMAN http://www.nature.com/nlink/v412/n6850/abs/412894a0_fs.html Cheers, Paul Pomes