Re: Social democrats on our list

2003-03-09 Thread Paul H. Merrill
It's actually Onizuka Air Force Station. It is contiguous to Moffet. And if one realizes the difference between collection, control, and interpretation, Some of the vile despicable actions become more clear. PHM - Original Message - From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Fresh Hell

2003-01-17 Thread Paul H. Merrill
Foolish Person. Thinking that the prevailing religious doctrine has anything to do with the Bible. PHM Paul H Merrill, MCSE, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Kevin S. Van Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "cypherpunks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

Re: encrypted data means Feds steal your computer forever?

2002-02-05 Thread Paul H Merrill
s (especially offshore) and off-site or > emergency hardware support contracts are a plus. I wonder if thin PCs > (those without disks) combined with encrypted off site data have a role to > play in protection against prosecutions and seizure interruptions? > > steve -- Paul H

Re: American Schools Need Flattening Too

2001-11-03 Thread Paul H Merrill
s Division > "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law" -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]

Re: Clubbing in Fortress Amerika (fwd)

2001-10-26 Thread Paul H Merrill
ture isn't reflected in > > the magstrip. > > They might store a long number and without a dictionary you > don't know what it means. It's unlikely that older cards > would use and XMLish annoted data. > > eg does > > 197202281800602 > mean i

Re: Code-I Moronics

2001-08-05 Thread Paul H. Merrill
27;t been found yet. (Yeah, it does what responsible programmers would have done in the first place.) Code-Red has not been successful against SecureIIS enhanced IIS. If there is some aspect not answered by this answer, feel free to ask a less ambiguous question. PHM -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, M

Re: SirCam contribution

2001-07-29 Thread Paul H. Merrill
Security Number: 326-70-5214Title!"#$'Root Entry >Fs0)1Table > WordDocument"SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjjObjectPools0s0 > FMicrosoft Word DocumentMSWordDocWord.Document -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: U.S. military poised to respond to attack on GOP convention

2000-08-05 Thread Paul H. Merrill
intelligence > >classes some years ago, and so don't take them as gospel. Furthermore, > >information is sometimes classified not because it represents a threat > >to the US but because it might embarrass someone. > > Thanks! > Bill > Bill Stewart, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639 -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CCNA, CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Jim Und Dave?Thanks Mr anon

2000-07-23 Thread Paul H. Merrill
hear that they're subjected > to idiocy in quantities far in excess of what is generally considered > the maximum safe daily dose. Don't worry about the poor AOL support folk, they are at least as stupid as even their users. PHM -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: John Young, the PSIA, and Aum

2000-07-23 Thread Paul H. Merrill
Tim May wrote: << Massive Snip >> > There ought to be an I.Q. test before people are allowed to join the > Cypherpunks list. > > --Tim May > As some of us are proof positive, IQ does not prevent stupid actions and statements. PHM -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JOB OPPORTUNITY

2000-07-17 Thread Paul H. Merrill
wesome opportunity please contact me today. > > Ann Pohlers > IT Recruiter > Comforce Technical Services > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ann Pohlers > IT Recruiter > Comforce Technical Services > 877-565-4992 > 877-292-8561 FAX > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul H. Merrill, MCNE, MCSE+I, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHM_Resume.doc

Re: Hacking Microsoft Networks

2000-07-02 Thread Paul H. Merrill
(thus minimizing the abilities of such toys as lophtcrack). I hope that this helps with the theoretical musings. And, of course, this was purely educational and only a top level view at that. Paul H. Merrill, Master CNE, MCSE+I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Okay... > > Rememb

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-20 Thread Paul H. Merrill
David Honig wrote: > > At 07:34 PM 6/19/00 -0400, Paul H. Merrill wrote: > >It isn't not invented here that is the problem -- it is the Not > >Developed Here. COTS is developed in a not verifiably secure > > Excellent point. But open source is a good place

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-19 Thread Paul H. Merrill
available for perusal and the compounding possibility of malicious compilers ever present the determination was made that COTS could not be guaranteed to be backdoor-, trapdoor-, and Trojan Horse-free. This is all on top of the probability of errors in COTS. OTOH NSA is not error-free and is not

Re:

2000-04-03 Thread Paul H. Merrill
f a master's learning curve), > its not surprising he found no fault with > his own work. > > All we know is that the public analysts, a small fraction > of total analysts :-), haven't found anything more significant. > > -- Paul H. Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]