like of the education business to some sort of culturally
> ingrained sloth, and characterize them as looking to live on handouts of
> other peoples tax money.
Nonetheless, I think we do such people a great disservice if we do not
show that their culture has a very bad bias against learni
e sows would surely be an excellent political statement.
Oh, how much I love these people who defend the right of the dictator to
murder his own citizens.
--
Mikko Särelä
Emperor Bonaparte: "Where does God fit into your system?"
Pièrre Simon Laplace: "Sire, I have no need for that hypothesis."
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
> Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
> been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
> repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
>
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> But try constructing an Independence Day without Will Smith. Or the
> special effects. Or the soundtrack. Or the distribution chain. Try
> guaranteeing that it arrives on schedule without making a loss.
Luckily movie industry will not be hit by the free
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, An Metet wrote:
> In order to prevent this, we need a website at which all pellet
> purchases will be announced, so that our friends and business partners
> avoid purchasing teddy bears at the same time.
And even that is not enough. If somebody wants to frame you as terroris
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Särelä wrote:
>
> > If you read my message a little bit more downwards, you would have seen
> > that I am all for getting rid of IP laws.
>
>
>
> > What I oppose is restrictions o
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Särelä wrote:
>
> > This talk about exploitation is purely Marxist dogma that has been
> > refuted many times.
>
> Where? I've certainly seen it claimed but never proven.
>
>
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Jei wrote:
> Copyright holder in fact is the same as a publisher (in general terms), and
> is just a business entity, which tries to exploit author (it works even in
> those cases when author and publisher is the same person). Author, generally
> speaking, does not depend o
