Re: [Mac_crypto] MacOS X (Panther) FileVault

ug report at bugreporter.apple.com (requires free registration) on the documentation. -- __ Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while, you realize the pig is enjoying it. __ Kevin Elliott

Re: Privacy qua privacy (Was: Photographer Arrested For Taking Pictures...)

At 12:58 -0500 on 12/31/02, Adam Shostack wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:49:28AM -0800, Kevin Elliott wrote: | At 12:12 -0500 on 12/31/02, Adam Shostack wrote: | >Rummaging through my wallet...a grocery card in the name of Hughes, a | >credit card with the name Shostack, and an e

Re: Dossiers and Customer Courtesy Cards

mpting to be >more polite, so I will say "Am I missing something in your analysis?" My oh my. Getting an early start on your new years resolution? -- ___ Kevin Elliott <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ#23758827 AIM ID: teargo ___

Re: Dossiers and Customer Courtesy Cards

At 11:02 -0800 on 12/31/02, Tim May wrote: On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 09:49 AM, Kevin Elliott wrote: At 12:12 -0500 on 12/31/02, Adam Shostack wrote: Rummaging through my wallet...a grocery card in the name of Hughes, a credit card with the name Shostack, and an expired

Re: Privacy qua privacy (Was: Photographer Arrested For Taking Pictures...)

card I've ever gotten they've said "here's your card and application, please fill out the application and mail it in". I say "thank you ma'am", walk out the door and toss the "application" in the trash. Not exactly strong (or any) name linka

Re: OPPOSE THE WAR! We are going to ruin Iraq to get the oil. Who's ne

hat's not good for either side. -- _________ Kevin Elliott <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ#23758827

RE: OPPOSE THE WAR! We are going to ruin Iraq to get the oil. W ho's ne

At 15:57 -0500 on 11/19/02, Trei, Peter wrote: Kevin Elliott[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Correction in the interest of historical accuracy. The idea that we succeeded in the revolutionary war by "inventing a new form of warfare". The reality is that the british were marching in form

Re: OPPOSE THE WAR! We are going to ruin Iraq to get the oil. W ho's ne

At 14:11 -0700 on 11/19/02, Mike Diehl wrote: On Tuesday 19 November 2002 01:57 pm, Trei, Peter wrote: > > Kevin Elliott[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Correction in the interest of historical accuracy. The idea that we > > succeeded in the revolutionary war b

Re: OPPOSE THE WAR! We are going to ruin Iraq to get the oil. Who's ne

At 13:14 -0700 on 11/19/02, Mike Diehl wrote: On Tuesday 19 November 2002 01:02 pm, Kevin Elliott wrote: > Correction in the interest of historical accuracy. The idea that we > succeeded in the revolutionary war by "inventing a new form of > warfare". The

Re: "Emergency Coercive Unit"

ought they were smart enough to hide themselves behind good capitalist weapons. Like an AR-15 or an MP-5. 3 -- _________ Kevin Elliott <mailto:kelliott@;mac.com> ICQ#23758827

Re: Did you *really* zeroize that key?

r specific. I can see how adding this to the spec would be worthwhile. But it's not essential to fix the problem above. -- _____ Kevin Elliott <mailto:kelliott@;mac.com> ICQ#23758827

Re: Confusion about Free Speech

At 20:32 -0800 on 2/27/01, Tim May wrote: >Citing libel and slander in the context of "free speech" is a >slippery slope. For one thing, neither libel nor slander has >anything to do with First Amendment issues, which are limitations on >censorship, prior restraint, etc. (Even the infamous "

Re: Here's an interesting twist on gun control ...

At 20:18 -0500 11/5/00, Steven Furlong wrote: >The supremes have decided, in their wisdom, that the amendments to the >federal constitution apply to the states as well. Thus, the 1st >amendment prohibits states as well as the feds from regulating speech. Not a question of wisdom- the 14th basicly

Re: CDR: Re: Shunning, lesbians and liberty

At 23:35 -0500 10/2/00, Jim Choate wrote: >On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, James A.. Donald wrote: > >> James A. Donald: >> > > Famines in Africa are caused by communism and socialism, notably > >>At 0233 PM 10/1/2000 -0500, Jim Choate wrote >> > Again, a simple-minded answer to a very complicated is

Re: one time pad and random num gen

At 22:48 -0400 10/2/00, Steve Furlong wrote: >Bill Stewart wrote: >> By contrast, if you've got a pseudo-random number generator, >> which uses some mathematical process to generate the numbers, >> knowing bits 1...I-1 tells you something about bits I...N, >> so if the message has structure to

Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial?

At 11:59 -0400 9/19/00, Matt Elliott wrote: >>would not affect my position one bit. These people have the right >>for their information to be put into the public forum. > >One small correction Kevin, they have the right to put their information >into their own public forum. I don't have to allow

Re: Wired News : FBI Gives a Little on Carnivore

At 11:58 -0400 7/26/00, Declan McCullagh wrote: >At 14:58 7/25/2000 -0400, Tim May wrote: >>I'm tempted to set up my own ISP just so I can tell them to fuck >>off and wave a shotgun at them as they try to install their >>equipment on my property. And even if they do manage to get a >>court-orde

Re: Fw: Congress breaks another Constitutional Amendment?

At 14:10 -0400 7/26/00, Marcel Popescu wrote: >Some people on these lists seem to have a lot of opinions about various >ammendments... > >- Original Message - >X-Loop: openpgp.net >From: "Breon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 1:09 PM >Subject:

Re: Jim Und Dave?

At 11:38 -0400 7/25/00, David Honig wrote: >At 12:32 AM 7/25/00 -0400, Kevin Elliott wrote: >>were unconstitutional. Another way of putting this would be for the >>government to outlaw brushing ones teeth. > >Simple. Outlaw possession of toothbrushes. Intercept at custom

Re: Carnivore - Matt Blaze testimony

At 13:12 -0400 7/25/00, Me wrote: >are you saying that the 3rd amendment grants congress the power >to make law for hte quartering of troops in private homes outside >of war? My read is that they can make allow allowing quartering but only in times of war. -- Kevin "The Cubbie" Elliott

Re: John Young, the PSIA, and Aum

At 23:48 -0400 7/22/00, William H. Geiger III wrote: >In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/22/00 >at 08:09 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>I feel that, if we as individuals are going to demand that our privacy be >>put back into our own hands (where it definately belongs), we need t

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

>> Can I make sure it is only being used for the reason I disclosed, >> and not for other reasons I didn't approve? > >I doubt that. In fact, I think it's impossible. In fact, I like that it's >impossible - it's THEIR information now, and you shouldn't have the ability >to prevent someone from u

Re: Cpunk Havenco's Weapon Choices

> That's what (I'd assume) the .50s are for. > > Unless you're going to waste a *lot* of time on training and >hiring >Mercs who have the experience, those .50s aren't going to do >you a lot of good >anyway. Remember that the original founder was a Major in the British military so

Re: FW: random seed generation without user interaction?

>- -Original Message- >X-Loop: openpgp.net >From: Jack Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 5:05 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: random seed generation without user interaction? > >Jeff - in your posting, you mentioned mouse pointer waving. You should b