On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:05:24PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> I'm still
> predicting radio-controlled helicopters (or RC planes, which could carry
> a far greater load).
>
> Or perhaps we'll see someone take a GPS-controlled small plane, which
> can carry 1,000 lbs, and turn it into a fly
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 05:42:41PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
>
> Another thing you learn here is how to deal with grizzlies. Don't be so
> focused on a distant moose that you ignore the bear behind you. And if it
> charges, stand your ground until it's 10 feet away, then shoot pepper spray
Please allow me to apologize -- I'm considering replacing the
ds.pro-ns.net CDR node. "cryptofortress.com" is mine, and I had believed
I only had it set up to forward cypherpunks postings to a testing list
while I worked on the details. Obviously, this was not the case,
and I have deactivated
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:00:34PM -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
>
> I've also found the source of the wrapped Message-Ids and I'll
> be fixing it soon.
>
>
> Eric
>
That's good news. The duplicated messages were confusing.
-Bill
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 11:54:35AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Bill O'Hanlon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 08:29:55AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> > > Actually they should ONLY be removing attachments to their subscribers, if
> > > they
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 08:29:55AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> Actually they should ONLY be removing attachments to their subscribers, if
> they are removing attachments in general then they are breaking the
> contract.
Contract?
ROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
de>
I think formail should be concatenating the lines before making the
check, but I see that it has a -c option that may help.
-Bill
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 10:07:36AM -0500, Bill O'Hanlon wrote:
>
>
> I've set mine to 128
I've set mine to 128. It had been 12800.
I see duplicates from certain people very consistently. I've
suspected that they address their mail to multiple CDRs and are
getting unique Message-IDs for each, but I've never checked into
it.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:08:56PM -0500, Igor Chudov
just as easily run on a Windows
machine and do the same job, and there's been very little interest
in having a widespread network of little remailers for workstations.
-Bill
--
Bill O'Hanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professional Network Services, Inc. 612-379-3958
>
> > Let me get this straight. You've got better things to do than
> > catch up on basic topics that have been hashed to death and are
> > very well expressed every two months in the archives, yet we don't
> > have anything better to do than personally address your laziness?
> > Am I correctly
lude my announcement from the end of May concerning one of
the cypherpunk nodes and how it helps cut down the spam. It's
somewhat relevant, and I tend to see fresh subscriptions each time
I make a new announcement, so there's some value to me in repeating
this.
From:Bill O'Hanl
administrated, and therefore
> subject to hacking?
It doesn't have to be remotely administered to be subject to hacking.
Windows 9X is not remotely administer-able, and it is hacked all the
time.
To put things in a proper cypherpunks perspective, John, cons
Does
anyone think that the FBI will do better on their black box?
As I said, all of these are less important than the real reasons for
disliking Carnivore, but they're also valid. The Agent's quip about
"using _electricitry_" irks me.
-Bill
--
Bill O'Hanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professional Network Services, Inc. 612-379-3958
ne or
has a header line of Approved: CPUNK in the message.
You can subscribe by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with other posters that removing toad.com mail gets rid of
a great deal of garbage. I've found the list to be much more readable
in the last couple weeks.
-Bill
--
Bil
ne or
has a header line of Approved: CPUNK in the message.
You can subscribe by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with other posters that removing toad.com mail gets rid of
a great deal of garbage. I've found the list to be much more readable
in the last couple weeks.
-Bill
--
Bil
ss is [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I scanned back and saw some toad posts that weren't spam, though, from
list notables such as Bill Stewart and (ironically) John Gilmore. You
guys might consider changing your posting habit.
-Bill
--
Bill O'Hanlon
No, the procmail recipe doesn't do any clever replying. Your suggestion
might be useful if the idea takes off. So far, it's not at all clear
that the idea will take off -- signups on the new filtering version
of the list have not been overwhelming -- which isn't that surprising,
really.
Your mu
17 matches
Mail list logo
