By LANCE GAY
Scripps Howard News Service
September 07, 2000
WASHINGTON - At least four federal agencies are sharing taxpayer data they are
gathering from Internet visitors to government Web sites with trade organizations,
retailers or other outside parties, congressional investigators say.
In
Larry Levinson wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm trying to get information on NAMBLA and found your post on a random
> search. I'm having trouble locating NAMBLA. The website seems to have been
> stopped. I've written to someone else (a former secretary of the group) but
> thought I'd try you as well.
>
> Some
At 05:27 PM 9/7/00 -0400, A. Melon wrote:
> Search-warrant affidavits reveal an undercover operation
> aimed at activists in Philadelphia for the GOP convention.
> By Linda K. Harris,, Craig R. McCoy and Thomas Ginsberg
> INQUIRER STAFF WRIT
http://www.vsia.com/
has a new paper on IP protection/detection
for cores.
Table of Contents
VSIA IP Protection DWG 1
Scope 1
Introduction 1
Overview: Security Schemes 2
Deterrents 3
Patents 4
Copyright 4
Trade Secrets 4
Governing Law 4
Protection Mechanisms 5
Encryption 5
Hardware Protection 5
State police infiltrated protest groups, documents
show
Search-warrant affidavits reveal an undercover operation
aimed at activists in Philadelphia for the GOP convention.
By Linda K. Harris,, Craig R. McCoy and Thomas Ginsberg
At 06:15 AM 9/7/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Tim May wrote:
>> You're missing a more important point: there is no correlation
>> between who is using the service or product and who is paying the tax.
>>
>> Taxing a computer used for video game playing, for example, when
>> absolutely no "piracy" is
Basically next year you could get a motherboard with a security module
onboard. Which is both your friend, and not.
The last EETimes-print-edition had an article with *much* more info but I
found the following online. You can comment on the www.trustedpc.org
stuff until October, on their site;
At 06:15 AM 9/7/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>not quite right. it is NOT the government that collects, and this is not
>a tax. there's a "non-profit" organisation called GEMA that collects and
>re-distributes these things.
>
So if you don't pay GEMA who *are* those folks with the guns?
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23462-2000Sep6.html
Of interest: though the unnamed spokesman asserted that the FBI is opposed to
profiling students to detect potential school violence, the article still
includes a laundry list of "warning signs": "The FBI provided a list of clues t
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
> Tim May wrote:
> >
> > Governments like this sort of thing, however. Tax everyone, then
> > spend the revenues as they wish.
>
> not quite right. it is NOT the government that collects, and this is not
> a tax. there's a "non-profit" organisation called GEMA
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:26:14PM -0400, David Marshall wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Kuzas) writes:
>
> > Can mind altering drugs be given to someone without - that person
> > knowing?
>
> Of course. What a silly question. How else can we explain you?
In fact, most contemporary mind-a
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Asymmetric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An aside is that I'm writing the application in Delphi 5, and the maximum
> native supported integer sizes are 32bit unsigned, and 64bit signed.. I've
> been writing a math library of my own in assembler that at compile time
> will allo
Dear Friend,
Please sit down because the secret Im about to reveal to
you will make you light headed-
Would you like to know how to turn $1.00 into $2,500.00
time after time with virtually no effort I CAN SHOW YOU
HOW!
If you want to change your lives circumstances fast, be able
to afford
Tim May wrote:
> You're missing a more important point: there is no correlation
> between who is using the service or product and who is paying the tax.
>
> Taxing a computer used for video game playing, for example, when
> absolutely no "piracy" is happening from that computer. An overly
> wide
14 matches
Mail list logo
