Re: Fw: (Fwd) Statement from Janet Reno

2000-06-20 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: "Matt Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The only problem is is doesn't check out when you go talk to the 60 Minutes > people. Oops. That should teach me... Mark

Re: Fw: (Fwd) Statement from Janet Reno

2000-06-20 Thread Matt Elliott
The only problem is is doesn't check out when you go talk to the 60 Minutes people. At 5:48 PM -0400 6/20/00, Marcel Popescu wrote: >Interesting indeed :) > >Mark > >> > << Read this statement from Janet Reno: >> > >> > "A Cultist is one who has a strong belief in the Bible and the >Second

Fw: (Fwd) Statement from Janet Reno

2000-06-20 Thread Marcel Popescu
Interesting indeed :) Mark > - Original Message - > From: "Chaumonde Porterfield-Pyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 6:14 AM > Subject: (Fwd) Statement from Janet Reno > > > > Interesting! Mitten > > > > --- Forwarded Message Follows -

Re: "Artificial intelligence" filter blocks news -- but not smut

2000-06-20 Thread James S. Tyre
At 10:06 AM 6/20/2000 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote: >http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,36923,00.html > >Smut Filter Blocks All But Smut >by Declan McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >3:00 a.m. Jun. 20, 2000 PDT >When Exotrope Inc. introduced its BAIR smut-blocking >software last year, ev

Re: filters

2000-06-20 Thread Bill O'Hanlon
Most of the things suggested here have been implemented by the lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] The difference between the two lists is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't resend sent to toad.com, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] also only forwards mail that has either CPUNK in the subject line or h

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-20 Thread David Honig
At 03:26 AM 6/20/00 -0400, Bill Stewart wrote: >>Not-invented-here is no excuse. > >In the crypto world, it used to be a decent excuse, because the >No Such Agency did have a lot more crypto experience than the civilian world, >and lots of people in commercial space kept reinventing the same snake

FC: Mexican hackers race clock to decrypt key files before election

2000-06-20 Thread Robert Guerra
-- Forwarded Message -- Date: June 20, 2000 9:52 AM -0400 X-Loop: openpgp.net From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FC: Mexican hackers race clock to decrypt key files before election [Elections in Mexico are scheduled for July 2. Apparently,

bootstrapping distributed infosharing CPUNK CDR NOFORN SOCHIST

2000-06-20 Thread David Honig
Interesting that napster has bootstrapped more general file sharing networks. Not just conceptually (though perhaps only that zebra mussel is more aggressive than that meme) but with content. AFAIK most alter-napster traffic is still mp3s. I imagine in a year or two this message will be quaint

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-20 Thread Tom Vogt
"Paul H. Merrill" wrote: > While CypherPunks tend to be a paranoid lot, they do not hold a candle > to the level of paranoia that is considered Line of Duty by the > Inte/CounterIntel Community. NSA has demonstrated a compiler that > introduces backdoors and Trojan aspects while compiling clean s

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-20 Thread Paul H. Merrill
David Honig wrote: > > At 07:34 PM 6/19/00 -0400, Paul H. Merrill wrote: > >It isn't not invented here that is the problem -- it is the Not > >Developed Here. COTS is developed in a not verifiably secure > > Excellent point. But open source is a good place to start. > They can train a batch

Re: losing laptops, opsec

2000-06-20 Thread Bill Stewart
At 10:23 AM 6/19/00 -0400, David Honig wrote: >>To some extent it may be because publicly available crypto algorithms >>aren't NSA-approved for military use, so there's no COTS code, >>though there may be NSA-built similar products. > >Not-invented-here is no excuse. In the crypto world, it used