At 07:34 PM 6/19/00 -0400, Paul H. Merrill wrote:
>It isn't not invented here that is the problem -- it is the Not
>Developed Here. COTS is developed in a not verifiably secure
Excellent point. But open source is a good place to start.
They can train a batch of recruits by having them attack/r
"Marcel Popescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> X-Loop: openpgp.net
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 5:33 AM
> Subject: NameBase is unique!
>
> Have you seen what this fucker is doing? At the end of the message, there's
> this thing:
>
> [
David Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The technical contact is named Bob Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
By the way, Network Solutions says that old Bob's phone number is
212-979-0471. Why don't some of you give them a call and tell him what
you think of his company?
Most of the things suggested here have been implemented by the
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference between the two lists is that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't resend sent to toad.com, and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also only forwards mail that has either CPUNK in the subject line or
h
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/19/00
at 12:48 PM, "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> --
>> From:William H. Geiger III[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> .com> said:
>>
>> >[Adding CPUNK to the Subject line of all legitimate posts helps prevent
>> >spam.]
>>
>> [Adding ANYTH
David Honig wrote:
>
> At 01:56 AM 6/18/00 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
> >At 12:12 PM 6/13/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
> >>When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
> >>to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives? They
> >>are somehow thinking physical s
PLEASE DIRECT THIS TO YOUR VP/ DIR OF MARKETING.
My name is Erick Mathe, President of United Telemedia in Miramar, Florida.
United Telemedia is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tiger Eye Broadcasting Corp.,
which owns and operates 27 broadcast television stations around the country. We
have a
At 3:10 PM -0400 6/19/00, Ari Garber wrote:
>Sorry to disturb, but what is a PITA?
>TIA
>
>ALG
>
>
> > From: William H. Geiger III[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> .com> said:
>>
>> >[Adding CPUNK to the Subject line of all legitimate posts helps prevent
>> >spam.]
>>
> > [Adding ANYTHING
Sorry to disturb, but what is a PITA?
TIA
ALG
--Original Message--
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 19, 2000 6:48:18 PM GMT
Subject: RE: Encrypted nanotech designs CPUNK
> --
> From:
> --
> From: William H. Geiger III[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> .com> said:
>
> >[Adding CPUNK to the Subject line of all legitimate posts helps prevent
> >spam.]
>
> [Adding ANYTHING to the Subject line is an annoying PITA]
>
> --
> -
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/19/00
at 09:46 AM, "Trei, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>[Adding CPUNK to the Subject line of all legitimate posts helps prevent
>spam.]
[Adding ANYTHING to the Subject line is an annoying PITA]
--
---
Yahoo is filtering mail which is preventing some list traffic getting to
addresses on their servers:
- Transcript of session follows -
while talking to mx1.mail.yahoo.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 553 Mail to/from [EMAIL PROTECTED] not allowed - Identified as
spam source 554 [EMAIL PROTECT
At 10:22 PM 6/18/00 -0400, David Lesher wrote:
>
>Note that ?by law or ex order? NSA is the sole supplier of crypto &
>keying material for classified material.
>
So? They could examine and approve COTS if any were good enough.
They are simply the designated tech & admin authority for the fedz; t
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Bill Stewart wrote:
> So does changing the Subject: line of messages count as moderation? :-)
>
I really do not see why people insist on screwing around with the subject
line. Why not just add a line to the header of the messages, say X-Filter:
CPUNKS. That way those who w
I really, really want to see ZKS and Freedom succeed, and
I understand people's dislike for the lack of open source and
the single points of failure inherent in their model.
There is one step that ZKS could take which would ease
many people's minds, though it would complicate their
business m
At 12:54 PM 6/18/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
>But the interesting question is not whether _some_ customers will use
>PetDotCom for ordering pound-sized blocks of goldfish food, but
>whether _enough_ customers will use PetDomCom to justify its
>currently still-rich, though sinking, stock price.
Ig
At 01:56 AM 6/18/00 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 12:12 PM 6/13/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>>When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
>>to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives? They
>>are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slackin
Dear Sirs,
We are an international trading company, mainly serving the European industry.
The Bitways Group purchases globally on own account and then resells the products to
various clients. Our aim is to source globally and to offer our clients the best
prices worldwide.
>From one of our o
18 matches
Mail list logo
