At 10:57 PM -0500 3/13/00, Matt Elliott wrote:
> >I just received my 'Census 2000' letter today, and on the envelope,
>>printed in big block letters, it reads: YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY
>>LAW.
>
>I got mine today. It took about 3 seconds to fill out the first question.
>The rest were left
At 10:57 PM 03/13/2000 -0500, Matt Elliott wrote:
>> I just received my 'Census 2000' letter today, and on the envelope,
>>printed in big block letters, it reads: YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY
>>LAW.
>
>I got mine today. It took about 3 seconds to fill out the first question.
>The rest were l
> I just received my 'Census 2000' letter today, and on the envelope,
>printed in big block letters, it reads: YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY
>LAW.
I got mine today. It took about 3 seconds to fill out the first question.
The rest were left blank as they have no bearing on the enumeration of
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But if this can't done how can they be attracting millions in venture
> capital, signing partnerships with media companies, etc., etc. Just look
> at their website and the press releases. Is this a case of the 'knig
> wearing no clothes'? Jeff
D
"R. A. Hettinga" wrote:
>
> At 9:47 PM -0500 on 3/9/00, Tim May wrote:
>
> > What Louis Freeh or Janet Reno or Boris Badonoff thinks about these
> > developments is interesting from a tactical point of view, in terms
> > of knowing where to deploy resources and how to man the front lines,
> > bu
Fisher Mark wrote:
> > cataloging and database functions while you use some
> > computerized search
> > engine to sift through it. but any search engine relies either on the
> > meaningfullness of full-text search, which is questionable, or on some
> > kind of catalogue, even if it's just META key
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You have some weird definitions. Blackmail: asking someone to pay you in
> > return of NOT divulging some information.
>
> That is a incomplete description. Blackmail is extortion. What you are
> extorting is money so that the party bei
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Whether YOU release it into the public domain is your business and doesn't
> effect the decision that others make or why.
It was MY signature, Jim. Wake up.
Mark
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: James A. Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For example if the new word groups unlike things together, and
> separates like things, it will merely generate error and confusion.
I agree. I'm not for "slavery is freedom" :) I am just saying that arguing
with someone because he
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is bullshit, plain and simple. If you're going to redefine a word
> every time then it means nothing to anyone, not even yourself.
Indeed, words mean nothing to everyone. Their meanings doesn't fall from the
sky. It's attributed by
10 matches
Mail list logo
