On Jan 22 07:58, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 13:20:46 -0800 (PST)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > dscho hooked me up with a workflow to run Git for Windows' test suite on
> > an msys2-runtime pull request's CI artifacts. With this patch and the
> > three you pushed (reverting the v2 patch w
Jon? Are yuo going to review this one?
Thanks,
Corinna
On Jan 20 00:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Commentary wording now refers to tasks (i.e., threads) rather than
> processes. This makes it somewhat easier to justify adding two kinds of
> counters together. After researching what "load average"
On Jan 17 10:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Add unavailable POSIX additions to Not Implemented section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Inglis
> ---
> winsup/doc/posix.xml | 26 --
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/winsup/doc/posix.xml b/winsup/doc/
On Jan 17 10:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Move entries no longer in POSIX from the SUS/POSIX section to
> Deprecated Interfaces section and mark with (SUSv4).
> Remove entries no longer in POSIX from the NOT Implemented section.
This looks good, but I just realized that a bunch of functions are
missi
Hi Brian,
your patch doesn't apply. Apparently you didn't rebase the patch to the
latest state in the main branch, because your patch contains the changes
from commit 0813644661e3, which I wrote I'll fix separately in
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2025q1/013265.html
Thanks,
Co
On 22/01/2025 10:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Jon? Are yuo going to review this one?
This looks fine to me. No notes. Please apply.
Thanks Mark!
(and a particular thank you for fixing the process vs. thread vagueness
I'd made in the comments)
On Jan 22 12:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 17 10:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > Add unavailable POSIX additions to Not Implemented section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Inglis
> > ---
> > winsup/doc/posix.xml | 26 --
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(
On Jan 20 10:36, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/20/2025 6:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Nice idea, but this may not do what is expected if the mapping is an
> > anonymous mapping, leaving the protection or mapping of trailing pages
> > in a wrong state, isn't it?
> >
> > Can we easily make sure the
Hi Corinna,
No - never occurred to me other changes would be made here - I have enough
problems tracking rebasing from *MY OWN* upstream!
On 2025-01-22 03:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Brian,
your patch doesn't apply. Apparently you didn't rebase the patch to the
latest state in the main b
On 22/01/2025 17:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
[...]
"Please note some changes are displaced due to rebase conflicts."
which only appear after commit --amend/rebase --continue!
As I said before, I am now noticing the limitations of interactive
rebasing and cherry-picking, sometimes skipping patches
On 2025-01-22 04:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 22 12:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 17 10:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
Add unavailable POSIX additions to Not Implemented section.
Signed-off-by: Brian Inglis
---
winsup/doc/posix.xml | 26 --
1 file changed, 24 in
Hi all,
Attaching the patch from the separate discussion in cygwin-developers - Re:
[Proposed changes/Incoming patch] Undocumented call to
ntdll.dll!NtAssignProcessToJobObject in msys2.0.dll / cygwin - included in
mingit/Git for Windows.
The following patch includes the replacement of the foll
On 22/01/2025 11:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 17 10:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
Move entries no longer in POSIX from the SUS/POSIX section to
Deprecated Interfaces section and mark with (SUSv4).
Remove entries no longer in POSIX from the NOT Implemented section.
This looks good, but I just r
13 matches
Mail list logo
