On Mar 3 20:36, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:39:40 +0100
> ASSI wrote:
> > Takashi Yano writes:
> > >> After noticing that we enumerate all the processes (which is an expensive
> > >> operation) just to skip all of the non-Cygwin ones anyway, I wonder if it
> > >> wouldn't be smart
The open() call for console sometimes fails if the console owner
process is closing the console by close() at the same time. This
is due to mismatch state of con.owner variable and attaching state
to the console. With this patch, checking con.owner and attaching
to con.owner sequence in open(), and
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations
> are supposed to *stay* independent.
>
> Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared objects in the native
> NT namespace and they don't know of each other. It's not only the
> process table but
On Mar 4 16:45, ASSI wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations
> > are supposed to *stay* independent.
> >
> > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared objects in the native
> > NT namespace and they don't know of each othe
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:38:07 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 4 16:45, ASSI wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations
> > > are supposed to *stay* independent.
> > >
> > > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared o