On Aug 23 12:51, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Attached patch to support %s in Cygwin winsup libc strptime.cc __strptime().
>
> This also enables support for %s in dateutils package strptime(1).
>
> In case the issue comes up, if the user wants to support %s as in date(1)
> with a
> preceding @ flag, th
On Aug 23 13:25, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2017-08-23 12:51, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > On 2017-07-23 22:07, Brian Inglis wrote:
> >> On 2017-07-23 20:09, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
> But that's just scanning a decimal integer to time_t.
> >>> It's not a question of whether I can
On Aug 24 11:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 23 13:25, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > Cygwin strptime(3) (also strptime(1)) fails with default width, without an
> > explicit width, because of the test in the following code:
> >
> > case 'F': /* The date as "%Y-%m-%d". */
> > {
> > LEGAL_
On 2017-08-24 03:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 23 12:51, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> Attached patch to support %s in Cygwin winsup libc strptime.cc __strptime().
>>
>> This also enables support for %s in dateutils package strptime(1).
>>
>> In case the issue comes up, if the user wants to support
On 2017-08-24 03:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 24 11:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Aug 23 13:25, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> Cygwin strptime(3) (also strptime(1)) fails with default width, without an
>>> explicit width, because of the test in the following code:
>>>
>>> case 'F': /* The da
On 2017-08-24 03:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 23 12:51, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> Attached patch to support %s in Cygwin winsup libc strptime.cc __strptime().
>> This also enables support for %s in dateutils package strptime(1).
>> In case the issue comes up, if the user wants to support %s as
