On 04/18/2017 05:04 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 17 03:39, Daniel Santos wrote:
I actually did try that, although I had guessed it wouldn't (and shouldn't)
work. I believe that the reason is that rather the accesses are volatile or
not, gcc can see nothing else using it and memset can be
Recent versions of gcc are optimizing away the TLS buffer allocated in
main, so we need to tell gcc that it's really used. RtlSecureZeroMemory
accomplishes this while also inlining the memset.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
---
winsup/utils/strace.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 dele
sourceware.org decided that I was a spammer for some weird reason...
Maybe this one will go through...
On 04/19/2017 10:52 AM, mailer-dae...@sourceware.org wrote:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
T
On Apr 19 11:06, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Recent versions of gcc are optimizing away the TLS buffer allocated in
> main, so we need to tell gcc that it's really used. RtlSecureZeroMemory
> accomplishes this while also inlining the memset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
> ---
> winsup/utils/stra
On 04/19/2017 01:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Pushed.
Thanks,
Corinna
Thanks. I hope this message goes through. Earlier when I tried to
respond with both you and cygwin-patches in the To: header it bounced. I
emailed cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com about this, is that the right address
for mail
Will this bounce again?
On 04/19/2017 05:10 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
Thanks. I hope this message goes through. Earlier when I tried to
respond with both you and cygwin-patches in the To: header it bounced.
I emailed cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com about this, is that the right
address for mailing list problems?
Actually, an
