On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
> these changes checked in. I'm more concerned with just nuking the
> now-unneeded mingw script.
Draft patch attached, based partially on Kai's. Yes, it needs a
Cha
Hi Yaakov,
On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
> > these changes checked in. I'm more concerned with just nuking the
> > now-unneeded mingw script.
>
> Dr
Hi Corinna,
2012/10/18 Corinna Vinschen:
> Hi Yaakov,
>
> On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
>>> these changes checked in. I'm more concerned with just n
On Oct 18 17:57, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> 2012/10/18 Corinna Vinschen:
> > Hi Yaakov,
> >
> > On Oct 18 02:33, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 15:32 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>> But, anyway, nevermind. This shouldn't be a requirement for getting
> >>> these
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:34 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Any problem to move mingw64-i686-zlib into the distro?
None; should I also move the other setup.exe prerequisites for
i686-w64-mingw32? Would you also like x86_64 versions of any of those?
> The idea of the branch is to collect all cha
