On Mar 2 21:59, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >...
> >
> >> //printf("key `%s' value `%s'\n", n, value);
> >>
> >
> >Why is this printf commented out? If it's not needed, please remove.
> >
>
> cvs annotate regtool.cc
> ...
> 1.1 (cgf 17-Feb-00): }
> 1.1
On 03 March 2006 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Btw., since you seem to be interested in hacking the registry... would
> you also be interested to introduce registry write access below
> /proc/registry inside of the Cygwin DLL? That would be extra cool.
> I'm not quite sure how to handle th
On Mar 3 13:12, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 03 March 2006 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >
> > Btw., since you seem to be interested in hacking the registry... would
> > you also be interested to introduce registry write access below
> > /proc/registry inside of the Cygwin DLL? That would be ext
> That's actually an interesting idea. I was always thinking along
> the lines of using POSIX file types (plain,socket,pipe,...).
>
> However, file suffixes is something we're already suffering from
> a lot (it's not by chance that SUFFix and SUFFer are so similar, IMHO).
Heh, yeh, who could
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Btw., since you seem to be interested in hacking the registry... would
> you also be interested to introduce registry write access below
> /proc/registry inside of the Cygwin DLL? That would be extra cool.
> I'm not quite sure how to handle the mappi
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
> > That's actually an interesting idea. I was always thinking along
> > the lines of using POSIX file types (plain,socket,pipe,...).
> >
> > What if a key "foo.sz" really exists and somebody wants to create
> > a registry key "foo"?
>
> No problem. If you
> Now, what if you write a file as foo.sz, and then write it as foo.dw. Do
> we change the key type?
Absolutely.
> Do we fail with ENOENT? What is the semantics there?
Well, the semantics of the registry API is that you specify the type
explicitly every time you set a value, and that do
On 03 March 2006 16:02, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure how to handle the mapping from file types to
>> registry key types, but there might be some simple way which I'm just
>> too blind to see.
>
> Hmm, there is currently no way for the programs to find out the registry
> key type,
--- Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "efault.faulted()" two lines above your change
> is supposed to catch
> NULL dereferences. I suspect that you were probably
> misled by the fact
> that gdb might show a SEGV in this function but that
> is to be expected
> (see lots of discus
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:12:01PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 03 March 2006 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >
> > Btw., since you seem to be interested in hacking the registry... would
> > you also be interested to introduce registry write access below
> > /proc/registry inside of the Cygwi
On 03 March 2006 17:42, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> Hey, how about using pseudo filename-extensions on the pseudo-files that
>> represent registry keys?
>
> As long as we are how-bouting, I'm looking at
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~tyemq/Win32-TieRegistry-0.24/TieRegistry.pm
>
> as anoth
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I applied the patch.
Thanks.
I just had to reformat your ChangeLog slightly
(a TAB before all lines, no extra indentation for lines which don't
start with a '*').
SeaMonkey expands tabs to spaces...
Will use attachment for ChangeLog next time.
Btw., since you se
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 03 March 2006 16:02, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>
> >> I'm not quite sure how to handle the mapping from file types to
> >> registry key types, but there might be some simple way which I'm just
> >> too blind to see.
> >
> > Hmm, there is currently no way for t
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Christian Franke wrote:
> In fact I had the idea to hack the registry, in particular fix the read
> access to registry values starting with backslash:
>
> $ cd /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/MountedDevices
> $ ls
> ...
> \DosDevices\C:
> \DosDevices\D:
> ...
> $ cat \
Igor Peshansky wrote:
What's wrong with using open() flags?
Save/restore registry tree in/from file tree wont work.
Suggest to start a new thread for this discussion
Right, good idea, except not on this list (as Dave pointed out). What
would be a good place -- cygwin-developers
15 matches
Mail list logo
