This patch contains a revised version of the "cygload" test utility,
this time with better adherence to cygwin naming and indentation.
---
ChangeLog for winsup/testsuite:
2005-05-27 Max Kaehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile: now tests cygload.
* cygload: New directory.
*
I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
course, asked him not to send me personal email which was pretty
confusing since I'd previously just sent him a personal reply.
Translation: I am a maroon.
Resending to the cygwin list this time...
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Wow! That's great! Thanks for doing this. It is much appreciated. This
> is something that I had been meaning to do and you did a better job than
> I would have. This truly deserves a gold star.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
> and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
> course, asked him not to send me personal email which was pretty
> confusing since I'd previously just sen
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Max Kaehn wrote:
> Resending to the cygwin list this time...
>
> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Wow! That's great! Thanks for doing this. It is much appreciated. This
> > is something that I had been meaning to do and you did a better job than
> >
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
>> and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
>> course, asked him not to send me p
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:03:07PM -0700, Max Kaehn wrote:
>This patch contains a revised version of the "cygload" test utility,
>this time with better adherence to cygwin naming and indentation.
Sorry, Max, but this is still using K&R indentation. Cygwin uses:
if (x)
{
y;
}
not
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
> >> and never noticed until I received a personal rep
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I wonder if this could, perhaps, be made more transparent to the
>programmer, by introducing a static marker, for example. Something like
>(again, modulo typos):
>
> void
> initialize_cygwin (int (*main) (int argc, char **argv),
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I guess you could do it that way. It would look more transparent to the
>end user if you did. You'd still have to make it clear that this has to
>happen first t
This patch contains a revised version of the "cygload" test utility,
this time with even better adherence to cygwin naming and indentation.
Igor, thanks for pointing me at "indent"-- it also pointed out
that I was forgetting to put spaces in front of the parameter
lists for my function calls.
I'm
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >I guess you could do it that way. It would look more transparent to the
> >end user if you did. You'd still
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:12:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >I guess you could do it that way. It
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:15:13PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:12:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:01:44PM -0700, Max Kaehn wrote:
>This patch contains a revised version of the "cygload" test utility,
>this time with even better adherence to cygwin naming and indentation.
>Igor, thanks for pointing me at "indent"-- it also pointed out
>that I was forgetting to put spac
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> There were still some braces at the end of the line in cygload.h so I
> changed those. I also changed the ChangeLog entry "now tests cygload"
> to "Test cygload". See http://cygwin.com/contrib.html for some common
> mistakes in ChangeLog en
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Max Kaehn wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > There were still some braces at the end of the line in cygload.h so I
> > changed those. I also changed the ChangeLog entry "now tests cygload"
> > to "Test cygload". See http://cygwin.com/contrib.h
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:07, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> I take it you meant
>
> - $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) ;\
> + $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) &&\
Oh, right, this is the world of shell scripts, not C. Thanks for
catching that.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Max Kaehn wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:07, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> I take it you meant
>>
>> - $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) ;\
>> + $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) &&\
>
>Oh, right, this is the world of shell script
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> So, I checked in the above and, after changing cygload.exp so that it
> compiles cygload.cc rather than cygload.cpp, I found a more serious
> error. I've attached the cygload.log file. It doesn't look pretty,
> unfortunately. You might not
20 matches
Mail list logo
