On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:55:38PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>- got_something_from_registry = regopt ("default");
> if (myself->progname[0])
>-got_something_from_registry = regopt (myself->progname) ||
>got_something_from_registry;
>+got_something_from_registry = regopt (myself->p
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:55:38PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >- got_something_from_registry = regopt ("default");
> > if (myself->progname[0])
> >-got_something_from_registry = regopt (myself->progname) ||
> >got_something_from_registry;
> >+got_s
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:48:30AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:55:38PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >- got_something_from_registry = regopt ("default");
>> > if (myself->progname[0])
>> >-got_something_from_registry = reg
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Here's the good news/bad news.
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:56:40AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >The simplification of the code from removing all of the reparenting
> >considerations is not something that I'm going to give up on easily.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>Can the code simply propagate the actual exit code into the exitcode
>field (since Windows programs don't know about signals)?
And who would use it? How would a UNIX program know that the "negative"
exit code represented a window
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Can the code simply propagate the actual exit code into the exitcode
> >field (since Windows programs don't know about signals)?
>
> And who would use it? How would a UNIX progra
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 01:20:45PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >Can the code simply propagate the actual exit code into the exitcode
>> >field (since Windows programs don't
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 01:20:45PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> >Can the code simply propagate the actual exit code
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 01:36:45PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>*I've also added an 'exitcode' field to _pinfo so that a Cygwin process
>>*will set the error (sic) code in a UNIX fashion based on whether it is
>>*exiting *due to a signal or with
