Re: [Patch] cygcheck: pretty_id misbehaving.

2004-10-15 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:36:21 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:31:16PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: [...] : > * cygcheck.cc (pretty_id): Correct layout. : : Thanks for the patch but I think it's possible to do this and make : things a li

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: pretty_id misbehaving.

2004-10-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:03:24PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: >ChangeLog-entry: > >2004-10-15 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * cygcheck.cc (pretty_id): Don't exit, return. Correct layout. Thanks. I've checked in a variation of this patch. I don't see any reason to guard against

Re: [Patch] testsuite and newlib's signal.h.

2004-10-15 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:55:59 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 05:31:31PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: : > Another trivial patch, a bit kludgy... : > : > ATM the testsuite does not build, because : > newlib/libc/include/sys/signal.h includes newlib/

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: pretty_id misbehaving.

2004-10-15 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:59:04 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:03:24PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: : > ChangeLog-entry: : > : > 2004-10-15 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : > * cygcheck.cc (pretty_id): Don't exit, return. Correct la