Gerd,
I'd really like your comments on this patch. As I reported before, it
didn't quite work for me, but with the recent problems in testing another
(presumably working) patch, I suspect my test procedure isn't quite
correct anyway. The patch basically adds a (very problem-specific)
reference c
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:44:34AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>Gerd,
>
>I'd really like your comments on this patch. As I reported before, it
>didn't quite work for me, but with the recent problems in testing another
>(presumably working) patch, I suspect my test procedure isn't quite
>correc
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:44:34AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Gerd,
> >
> >I'd really like your comments on this patch. As I reported before, it
> >didn't quite work for me, but with the recent problems in testing another
> >(presumably wor
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> 2) The other problem is that I find it sort of odd to see the dec()
>> method performing a deletion. Couldn't this be handled where, IMO,
>> it should logically be handled, in the close function, e.g.,
>>
>> if (!audio_out_->d
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> 2) The other problem is that I find it sort of odd to see the dec()
> >> method performing a deletion. Couldn't this be handled where, IMO,
> >> it should logically be handled,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:28:56PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >> 2) The other problem is that I find it sort of odd to see the dec()
>> >> method performing a deletion. C
