[PATCH] cygcheck: don't fail integrity check on empty package

2003-09-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Hi, This patch fixes the erroneous failure of "cygcheck -c" when the package is empty (and thus the file list for it is missing), e.g., XFree86-base. Igor == ChangeLog: 2003-09-05 Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: don't fail integrity check on empty package

2003-09-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Hi, > > This patch fixes the erroneous failure of "cygcheck -c" when the package > is empty (and thus the file list for it is missing), e.g., XFree86-base. > Igor Sorry, I've messed up the ChangeLog entry. The correct one is included below. >

Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: don't fail integrity check on empty package

2003-09-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:53:54PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>This patch fixes the erroneous failure of "cygcheck -c" when the >>package is empty (and thus the file list for it is missing), e.g., >>XFree86-base. > >Sorry, I've messed up the Chang

Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: don't fail integrity check on empty package

2003-09-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:53:54PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >>This patch fixes the erroneous failure of "cygcheck -c" when the > >>package is empty (and thus the file list for it is missing), e

Re: nanosleep patch 1

2003-09-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:40:17PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >This is part 1 of the patch I sent yesterday. >See previous mails for background info. >Here are some more details: > >hires_ms::minperiodMake NO_COPY for per process initialization. >hires_ms::resolution For use in sleep an