[patch] Tcl 20030128-3 changes to handle Cygwin pathnames

2003-02-02 Thread Mumit Khan
Jeff Hobbs had put in some of my changes that allows Cygwin pathnames into Tcl 8.3.5, but it doesn't work with the new filesystem code in Tcl 8.4. The new filesystem code does make it a bit easier to support such "non-native" filenames. Hopefully these will go into Tcl core at some point. The 3 ca

Re: [patch] Tcl 20030128-3 changes to handle Cygwin pathnames

2003-02-02 Thread Earnie Boyd
Hi Mumit, If cygwin specific code already exists in the official source then I suggest you submit your patch to the tcl.sf.net project. Earnie. Mumit Khan wrote: Jeff Hobbs had put in some of my changes that allows Cygwin pathnames into Tcl 8.3.5, but it doesn't work with the new filesystem cod

doc patch for CYGWIN codepage=, regtool

2003-02-02 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
I've checked in this documentation patch that fixes a couple of things. There was talk of a codepage:none option, but it's not in cygwin yet so I'm ignoring it for now. I missed the regtool patch that added -K way back in August http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q3/msg00238.html

Re: [patch] Tcl 20030128-3 changes to handle Cygwin pathnames

2003-02-02 Thread Mumit Khan
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Earnie Boyd wrote: > If cygwin specific code already exists in the official source then I > suggest you submit your patch to the tcl.sf.net project. Certainly, but no reason to wait for the next release of Tcl to get this code into the Cygwin package. It takes a lot of work to

Re: [patch] Tcl 20030128-3 changes to handle cygwin pathnames

2003-02-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:41:07PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote: >On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Earnie Boyd wrote: > >> If cygwin specific code already exists in the official source then I >> suggest you submit your patch to the tcl.sf.net project. > >Certainly, but no reason to wait for the next release of Tcl t

Re: doc patch for CYGWIN codepage=, regtool

2003-02-02 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > [snip] > I missed the regtool patch that added -K way back in August > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q3/msg00238.html > > but it would be great to get patches for utils.sgml whenever a util > is patched, or at least a heads-u

Re: doc patch for CYGWIN codepage=, regtool

2003-02-02 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
> Incidentally, does anyone know where the source of the regtool manpage is? > It should be patched accordingly, but I couldn't find it. (Also replied to in [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >From /usr/doc/Cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-2.README : - The two intro pages (intro.1 and intro.3) were written by ha