On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:29:05AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Maybe not so "less intrusive" after all. I broke out the etc handling
> stuff into a separate class and moved even more functionality into
> pwdgrp than you did. I hope Corinna approves.
As long as it works it's ok with me.
C
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:07:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:57:21AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >>Here is the code as it stands. It compiles & runs, and passes
> >>fork tests correctly. Feel free to takeover or at least
> >>have a look. I will continue
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:06:02AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:07:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:57:21AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >>Here is the code as it stands. It compiles & runs, and passes
>> >>fork tests correct
Attached is a patch that implements nanosleep() by attempting to
reuse the current sleep() implementation which seems to provide the
necessary functionality.
I'm not sure if there is a better way to convey the fact that
sleep_worker() was interrupted than my current implementation.
Comments on thi
Hello Chris,
I like your code, just made a few changes. The explanations below
are detailed and longer that the changes!
In load(), CloseFile wasn't called on read error, and it was called
before GetFileTime.
It seems that declaring passwd_buf, group_buf etc NO_COPY means that
there will be a m
Chris,
An ugly tought came to my mind while doing the dishes:
there is a race condition left.
FindFirstChangeNotification must be called from init, otherwise
in the normal case it will be called after the load, leaving
a window where the file can be updated without being noticed.
Similarly in the
