On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:19:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> It appears that ReadProcessMemory() can fail with ERROR_NOACCESS under
> NT 4.0. See attached patch.
Applied. Thanks!
> BTW, my mmap-test test case works under NT 4.0 without this patch.
> However, vsFTPd does not. Go figure!
De
Corinna,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:11:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:19:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > It appears that ReadProcessMemory() can fail with ERROR_NOACCESS
> > under NT 4.0. See attached patch.
>
> Applied. Thanks!
You are welcome.
> > BTW,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:57:21AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Here is the code as it stands. It compiles & runs, and passes
>fork tests correctly. Feel free to takeover or at least
>have a look. I will continue testing tomorrow evening.
>
>I include only the 5 files that are related
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:07:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:57:21AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>Here is the code as it stands. It compiles & runs, and passes
>>fork tests correctly. Feel free to takeover or at least
>>have a look. I will continue testing to
Chris,
This patch rounds out the 230.4Kbps support in
fhandler_serial::tcsetattr() - this check probably should have been there
all along, but now catches any invalid DCB parameters (ie. trying to set an
invalid bitrate for a given port) and returns w/ errno = EINVAL as POSIX
dictates. Can you r
