Hi!
Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF>> I've made a new version of binutils available for download. This is
CF>> just a refresh from sources.redhat.com. A notable change is the
CF>> additi
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 5165
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Is it usable without Cygwin?
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>>
>> I guess i should put it to the
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to th
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> EB> egor duda wrote:
>>
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:08:26PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>
>I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks c
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:08:26PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-rel
Two issues: (1) the licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
pseudo-reloc. Item (1) here, item (2) in a separate message.
CF> I'm not sure that public domain is going to work with the cygwin
license.
ED> IANAL, but i can't see why not.
Here's why: in order for code to be incorpora
Two issues: (1) the licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
pseudo-reloc. Item (2) here, item (1) in an earlier message.
One thing that does worry me, though, is the more we rely on special
runtime tricks and hackish pei-x86 "extensions", the more fragile the
whole system becomes.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:28:41PM +1300, Craig McGeachie wrote:
>On 18 Nov 2002 at 20:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> The sources in the release need the *CVS* version of w32api. See? Problems
>> already.
>
>Indeed. Problems. I'll see what I can do to get CVS read access.
FYI, we've received
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseudo-relocs.
>* cygwin/lib/_cygwin_crt0_common.cc: Perform pseudo-relocs durin
--- Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two issues: (1) the
licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
> pseudo-reloc. Item (2) here, item (1) in an earlier message.
>
> One thing that does worry me, though, is the more we rely on special
> runtime tricks and hackish pei-x86 "
ed> Question: How can one distinguish console application from GUI one?
ed> What is the best wording for the error message?
Here's an example. If GetConsoleWindow is available (W2K or XP) it uses
that; otherwise, it uses a different kludge.
The idea is you'd call has_console() or
GetConsoleWin
Charles Wilson wrote:
Oops. Left a debugging fragment in there. Use the attached version
instead of the previous one.
/* poor man's wincap */
OSVERSIONINFO version;
memset (&version, 0, sizeof version);
version.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof version;
GetVersionEx (&version);
get_conso
16 matches
Mail list logo
