> -Original Message-
> From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:19 AM
> To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function
> arguments need to be pointers
>
>
> It looks like y
Rob,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:31:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:58 PM
> >
> > Could #2 have caused the problem that we saw with Python's
> > test_threadedtempfile regress
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:38 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Thomas Pfaff; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] minor pthread fixes
>
>
> Rob,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:31:52AM +1000, Robert Collins w
Rob,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:37:04PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> From memory - no. Alsothe symptoms are wrong - the test hangs, not
> prematurely exiting. Anyway, it shouldn't be too hard to build a test
> .dll and give it a try. If you want I can shoot such a beast over to
> you.
No, tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:08 PM
> > Since i can not judge which function is obsolete (i guess
> > dll_global_dtors
> > is) i have attached a small patch that will make sure that
> the dtors run
> > only onc
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:46:28PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Thomas Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:08 PM
>
>> > Since i can not judge which function is obsolete (i guess
>> > dll_global_dtors
>> > is) i have atta
This patch + regenerating newlib configuration files prevents cc1
warnings like:
cc1: warning: changing search order for system directory
"/notnfs/fitzsim/src-newlib-cygwin/i686-pc-cygwin/newlib/targ-include"
cc1: warning: as it is the same as non-system directory
"../../targ-include"
cc1: war
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (update)
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:46:28PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:05 AM
>
> Ookay. I don't think that either function is obsolete... and
> neither you nor Corinna had commented.
I should enlarge on this.
The reason that I don't think that either function is obsolete is
