RE: help/version patches

2002-02-26 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Daniel Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] It's not - strace is manually entered version info. > Anyway here is a patch for cygcheck that I think does the > right thing. Somebody want to take a look? +const char *revision="$Revision: 1.22 $"; T

Re: /proc and /proc/registry

2002-02-26 Thread Chris January
> 1) The copyrights still need to be changed. Done. > 2) The code formatting still is not correct. Now piped through indent with a few touch-ups. > 3) You have a lot of calls to normalize_posix_path. Is that really >necessary? It seems to be called a lot. If it is really necessary, >I'd

RE: help/version patches

2002-02-26 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joshua Daniel Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > +const char *revision="$Revision: 1.22 $"; > > This is suspect: The revision string can look like $Revision:$ in some > circumstances - see man co