Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
Right. I completley naffed my sandbox with Gary's work in it :[. Gary... can I please have that missing bit of the changelog? Jan, I'll get your patch in straight after I commit Gary's. Rob === - Original Message - From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EM

RE: [PATCH] Setup.exe "other URL" functionality

2002-01-03 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yep, it looks like that combined with me now using binary mounts will > work > > around this. For re

Re: [PATCH] Setup.exe "other URL" functionality

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You should be ok with text mounts now, I think this problem cropped up > > due to the CRLF's in the repository. I'm checking in a new version asap. > > > > Ok, thanks. As of this writing I don't see it yet - did

RE: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:27 AM > To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen; Gary R. Van Sickle > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf > packages] > > > Right. I completley

Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:46 PM Subject: RE: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages] > > -Original Message- >

RE: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> I'd love a patch with the following: > * cistring.cc: Ran d2u. > * cistring.h: Ditto. > * desktop.h: Ditto. > * localdir.h: Ditto. > * net.h: Ditto. > * proppage.h: Ditto. > * propsheet.h: Ditto. > * root.h: Ditto. > * source.h: Ditto. > * splash.h: Ditto. > * threebar.cc: Ditto. > *

Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:11 PM Subject: RE: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages] > > I'd love a patch with the fo

Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Robert Collins
Right, this is now in CVS> Sorry about the muckup. Rob === - Original Message - From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:12 AM Subject: Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experim

Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf packages]

2002-01-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right, this is now in CVS> Sorry about the muckup. Ok, thanks, it's there. How should errors in postinstall scripts be handled? It is tempting to replace postinstall.cc: find (cygpath ("/etc/postinstall", 0), run_script_in_etc_postinstall