Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Right. Well setup compiled before w32api got broken. I've said it twice
> now: revert your w32api (which is what's broken) and setup will build
> cleanly.
>
> Fixing w32api again is important, and can be address'd in parallel.
> Anyone that wants to build setup.exe will
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ok. I like having just a one-line prompt.
>
> See my other emails. Lets leave this to the side, it's orthogonal to the
> remove script work you've done.
Yes, fine.
> Right. Well setup compiled before w32api got broken. I've said it twice
> now:
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > Right. Well setup compiled before w32api got broken. I've said it twice
> > now: revert your w32api (which is what's broken) and setup will build
> > cleanly.
> >
> > Fixing w32api again is important, and can be address'd i
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
> If someone wants to follow my notes in reply to Corinna and create a
> shell defaults package, that would be great. AFAIK all distro's generate
> a very simply prompt for you, and then leave it up to you.
One thing that might be useful:
SuSE Linux se
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:25:11PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
>> If someone wants to follow my notes in reply to Corinna and create a
>> shell defaults package, that would be great. AFAIK all distro's generate
>> a very simply prompt for you, and t
Strangely enough, building from CVS works fine for me - w32api seems
fine.
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> > Can you remind me as to what's broke?
>
> From an earlier mail (haven't checked latest cvs):
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 5:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Subject: Re: setup.exe remove scripts [Was: Re: experimental texmf
> packages]
>
>
> Strangely enoug
