On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:18:11PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>> 2) The patch is included is an html attachment.
>>
>> Obviously 1) is a no-op but we really need just a straight patch in
>> regular text.
>>
>Well, I'm not sure this is what you mean, here is the straight text of the
>fi
> 2) The patch is included is an html attachment.
>
> Obviously 1) is a no-op but we really need just a straight patch in
> regular text.
>
Well, I'm not sure this is what you mean, here is the straight text of the
file.
Seems kinda silly for one this short. I put it in stackdump.sgml in
/src/wi
existance of the
>cygwin_stackdump() function. ChangeLog:
>
>2001-04-03 Joshua Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * stackdump.sgml: New file. Document cygwin_stackdump() function.
I'd probably accept this except for two things:
1) You don't add ChangeLo
nklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* stackdump.sgml: New file. Document cygwin_stackdump() function.
The function is described as "Temporary?" when first mentioned in the
ChangeLog, but since it appears to have been around since the first
net-release:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-a
