> Incidentally, does anyone know where the source of the regtool manpage is?
> It should be patched accordingly, but I couldn't find it.
(Also replied to in [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>From /usr/doc/Cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-2.README :
-
The two intro pages (intro.1 and intro.3) were written by ha
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> [snip]
> I missed the regtool patch that added -K way back in August
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q3/msg00238.html
>
> but it would be great to get patches for utils.sgml whenever a util
> is patched, or at least a heads-u
I've checked in this documentation patch that fixes a couple of things.
There was talk of a codepage:none option, but it's not in cygwin yet
so I'm ignoring it for now.
I missed the regtool patch that added -K way back in August
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q3/msg00238.html
