On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:44:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:56:25PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > Was this the right thing to do?
> >
> > The patch isn't correct since it now ca
Corinna,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:56:25PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Was this the right thing to do?
>
> The patch isn't correct since it now calls fdsock() twice which allocates
> a new fhandler even if the line before a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a SEGV when getsockname () is called. This
> problem can be tickled by the PostgreSQL 7.2 version of psql:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-02/msg00012.php
>
> Note that I essential
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Was this the right thing to do?
>
> I think so. It begs the question, though: do we need to apply this
> patch elsewhere, too?
I don't know. Maybe Corinna wou
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>The attached patch fixes a SEGV when getsockname () is called. This
>problem can be tickled by the PostgreSQL 7.2 version of psql:
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-02/msg00012.php
>
>Note that I essentially pla
The attached patch fixes a SEGV when getsockname () is called. This
problem can be tickled by the PostgreSQL 7.2 version of psql:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-02/msg00012.php
Note that I essentially plagiarized the following commit:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2
