Re: addr2line [ Was: better stackdumps ]

2008-03-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: > I think I see what's going on here though, the Cygwin fault handler took > the first chance exception and wrote the stackdump file, and only then > passed it on to the debugger, so that by the time gdb got notice of the > fault the stack was all fubar. This could be the rea

Re: addr2line [ Was: better stackdumps ]

2008-03-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:23:05AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> Is it a big problem to fix addr2line to deal with .dbg files? >> >> I like your idea to add names to the stackdump especially because of >> addr2line's brokenness. But, actually, if addr2line would work w

addr2line [ Was: better stackdumps ]

2008-03-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Is it a big problem to fix addr2line to deal with .dbg files? > > I like your idea to add names to the stackdump especially because of > addr2line's brokenness. But, actually, if addr2line would work with > .dbg files, there would be no reason to add this to the stackdu